I was delighted recently to be a featured speaker at the World Council for Health’s kick off in the United States – the “Better Way for the U.S.A.” Conference in Providence, Rhode Island.
My topic was “How to Prevent Global Health from Turning into Globalist Control.”This issue is of the utmost urgency, as the Digital Gulag is being constructed rapidly all around us at this very moment. What is a “Digital Gulag? It is a surveillance-based global digital police state.
It has four pillars, like a four-legged chair.
Digital IDs
Central Bank Digital Currencies – programmable money
Massive Surveillance Analyzed by Artificial Intelligence
Physical Infrastructure – colossal data centers needed to process AI.
Other featured speakers included Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Bret Weinstein, Del Bigtree, Dr. Paul Marik, attorney Mary Holland, Dr. Pierre Kory, Jan Jekielek, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, and many more. It was a thrill to share a podium with medical freedom giants such as these, and I am grateful to Dr. Tess Lawrie (Ambassador for the World Council for Health & The Better Way movement) for the invitation.
You can purchase a virtual pass to view the entire conference online HERE.
Anni and Ruli in front of Berkeley’s Campanile, 2026
Anni Zhang, whom we rescued from China at age 10, just graduated from U.C. Berkeley!
For those of you who don’t know about Anni, she was known as “China’s youngest prisoner of conscience.” We rescued her, and her older sister, Ruli, in 2013.
These are the daughters of Zhang Lin – one of the bravest Chinese human rights activists. Zhang Lin was one of the leaders of the Tiananmen Square movement, in Anhui province. He was jailed and tortured repeatedly for his activism.
When the Chinese Communist Party could not silence Zhang Lin, they resorted to kidnapping his young daughter, Anni, out of her 4th grade classroom, and detaining her and her father overnight.
In 2013, when he and Anni were under house arrest, he got word out to me, asking that I help his daughter, Anni, come to the United States, as she could not live a normal life in China. With help from the U.S. government and several very brave activists from China, Anni and Ruli were able to escape China and come to the United States.
Reggie greets Anni and Ruli at the San Francisco Airport upon their arrival in the United States, 2013
Anni was 10 when she arrived in the United States. Ruli was 19. We raised Anni in our home as our own daughter for eight years, until she went off to college. Ruli also lived with us for almost two years. Anni arrived speaking no English. It is an incredible achievement for her to graduate from her first-choice college, U.C. Berkeley.
Reggie and Anni on vacation in Yosemite
Something special about Anni is her incredible musical talent. When she arrived at our home, she sounded out tunes on our piano. I suggested to my husband that we get her piano lessons from a Mandarin-speaking teacher, to give her an outlet while she learned English. Little did anyone know that, after only three years of lessons, Anni would win a competition to play in Carnegie Hall!
Anni performs a Chopin Etude at Carnegie Hall, 2016
Our goal for Anni was just to give her the opportunity to live a normal life, breathing the air of freedom in the United States. And yet, she has done so much more than that.
Anni, you are amazing. Congratulations on all your achievements! May God continue to bless you in all you do in life!
Here are links to news reports about Anni, for those who would like to learn more:
Daughter of Chinese Activist Arrives in US to Begin New Life https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/daughter-of-chinese-activist-arrives-in-us-to-begin-new-life-281475
The Infinite Value of Every Life (Eric Metaxas, Breakpoint) https://breakpoint.org/the-infinite-value-of-every-life/
Left. Reggie wins Gold in the Standing Long Jump. Middle. Reggie wearing her medals for the Standing Long Jump, 100 Meter Dash and 50 Meter Dash. Right. Reggie competes in the Shot Put.
Dear Friend,
I rarely publish anything about my personal life, but I’m hoping you will share my excitement about this new development.
About five weeks ago, I decided that I need to focus more on my physical fitness. I enjoyed being a competitive athlete during college (volleyball), so I thought the best way to incentivize myself to work out consistently was to compete.
So, I registered for the Maryland Senior Olympics – open to anyone 50 or older.
I chose Track and Field because sprinting, jumping and throwing are skills we need to maintain to carry strength and speed as we age.
I registered for:
Standing Long Jump Running Long Jump 50 Meter Dash 100 Meter Dash Shot Put
I got clearance from my doctor, engaged a coach, and began training.
To my astonishment, I won first place in the standing long jump – a gold medal!
In Maryland, to qualify to compete at Nationals, you have to place in the top four competitors from Maryland in your age group. I qualified for nationals in all the events (except possibly the Shot Put, as I have not yet seen the results from that event yet).
Why did I decide five weeks ago to prioritize getting in shape? This decision was not made suddenly or on a whim. In the past year, I have lost too many dear friends, mentors, and esteemed colleagues. In addition, I have many friends who are dealing with very serious and even life-threatening health issues. The recent death of brilliant freedom fighter and lawyer Warner Mendenhall hit me particularly hard.
If I am going to continue to be a leader in the battle against the encroachment of CCP-style surveillance and control worldwide, I need to be strong – very strong – in body, mind and spirit. Otherwise, I could get knocked out of the game by a sudden, serious illness.
Activists can tend to neglect themselves, pouring out every bit of time and energy to advance their cause. I have been no exception. So often I have let immediate deadlines, or long-haul flights to Europe, take precedence over working out, eating right, or sleep. But I have to keep in mind: this battle is not a sprint, but a marathon.
Thank God, I am still healthy. But if I were to continue to deprioritize my physical health, how long could my body remain strong?
If you have read this far into this newsletter, I want to thank you for caring about me personally. And for sharing my joy at the small achievement of winning a gold at the state level and qualifying for Nationals in multiple events.
The real test of strength will be at Nationals (Tulsa, July 2027), where I will be competing against elite athletes from all over the nation. The prospect of this will help me focus on consistent exercise, including cardio and strength training. I will engage coaches to make sure I can do all of this correctly and safely. My doctors, chiropractor and physical therapist are already onboard.
I would encourage anyone who feels their fitness slipping to take the initiative to turn this situation around, while you still can. Take care of your health before you get sick. If you are over 50, you can participate in the Senior Olympics in your state. In Maryland, there are no tryouts required. I believe the rules are similar in other states. You just register to compete in your age group. I would encourage you to check it out. Competing is fun, healthy, and opens a whole new world of new friendships and healthy challenges.
Rep. John Moolenaar’s recent letter to five major U.S. pharmaceutical companies should serve as a wake-up call. While stopping short of alleging any wrongdoing, the House Select Committee on China is actively investigating major U.S. drugmakers over clinical trials conducted in China, including allegedly at hospitals in Xinjiang and at Chinese military-linked institutions. In my opinion, U.S. pharmaceutical firms conducting clinical trials in the People’s Republic of China are not just making questionable business decisions; they are exposing Americans to national security risks while entangling themselves in one of the most ethically compromised environments in the world.
The national security dimension alone is disqualifying. In May 2019, China’s state media publicly framed the escalating confrontation with the United States as a “people’s war,” signaling a total struggle that mobilizes political, economic, technological, and other resources against the United States. That language was not a throwaway phrase; it described a comprehensive strategy that explicitly reaches far beyond tariffs and trade.
Against that backdrop, the idea that American companies would voluntarily place sensitive clinical research inside China defies logic. This is a regime with a long, well-documented record of intellectual property theft in sectors ranging from advanced technology to biomedicine, which U.S. analysts have described as part of a broader campaign of economic and strategic appropriation. Clinical trial data is not just commercially valuable; it is strategically valuable. Reuters reported on June 30 that the House Committee had opened investigations into whether trials conducted in China may have helped fuel the country’s military capability, and the committee’s own materials state that conducting such research at PRC military hospitals puts cutting-edge biotechnology intellectual property at risk of transfer to the Chinese military.
The risks intensify when those trials involve Chinese military-linked institutions. Rep. Moolenaar’s inquiry raises concerns that research allegedly conducted at PRC military hospitals could expose cutting-edge biotechnology intellectual property to transfer risks involving the Chinese military. Conducting trials in PLA-affiliated facilities opens a channel for sensitive information to flow into the hands of a foreign military.
The ethical failures are even more disturbing. Clinical trials conducted in Xinjiang raise profound moral questions. In January 2021, the U.S. Department of State formally determined that the Chinese government is committing genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities in Xinjiang. The findings underlying that determination included forced sterilization, forced medical testing, mass arbitrary detention, and other severe abuses. In addition, there is substantial, growing evidence that forced organ harvesting occurs in Xinjiang and other areas of China.
Under such conditions, informed consent is implausible. The assumption that individuals living under constant surveillance and under threat of coercion can freely volunteer for experimental medical research is questionable at best. The more uncomfortable possibility is that such environments are attractive precisely because they eliminate the inconvenience of rigorous ethical standards and genuine patient autonomy. That concern is no longer hypothetical: the committee’s public materials note that China’s clinical trial system relies on rapid enrollment “three to five times faster than in the United States.” Is this rapid enrollment due in part to a lack of ethical safeguards regarding informed consent and voluntary participation? The committee specifically questions whether subjects in Xinjiang are participating voluntarily.
Rep. Moolenaar notes in his June 29 letter to Pfizer that the company “will no longer sponsor trials in Xinjiang and at PRC military hospitals in the future.” This is a welcome step, but it is not enough. One central question remains unanswered: Are any of these companies still conducting ongoing trials in these environments today?
The American public—and Congress—should demand a clear answer. Congress should also consider prohibiting the FDA from accepting, reviewing, or relying on clinical data generated at PRC military hospitals or in Xinjiang, where the conditions necessary for ethical research and trustworthy consent cannot be assured.
This investigation is not simply about competition with China. It is about whether U.S. companies are willing to compromise core ethical principles and national security interests in pursuit of speed, cost savings, or market access. Conducting clinical trials in a genocide-linked region or within a military-integrated system controlled by an adversarial regime are lines that should not be crossed.
If the United States is to lead in medicine, it must lead without abandoning the principles that make that leadership legitimate. Anything less is not just a strategic error—it is a moral failure.
From 1776 to the digital age, the fight for unalienable rights continues.
The blessings of liberty are not guaranteed for the next generation.
New technologies can serve freedom or control it. The choice is still ours.
250th Independence Day – Defending Our Freedom
Today, on the 250th anniversary of our nation’s birth, I reflect on the sacrifice our Founders made. The men who signed the Declaration of Independence knew they were risking everything for the cause of liberty.
Signer Benjamin Rush later recalled the atmosphere in the chamber when they stepped up to sign the Declaration of Independence:
“Do you recollect the pensive and awful silence which pervaded the house when we were called up, one after another, to the table of the President of Congress to subscribe what was believed by many at that time to be our own death warrants?”
The Signers of the Declaration of Independence understood that, if the colonies were to lose the war, the King of England would convict them of high treason, the penalty for which was a grisly death.
Yet the Signers risked everything to found a new nation, based on this principle:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Our Founders understood that our rights come from God, not from government. Governments exist to secure those rights—not to digitize, score, or control their citizens.
New Threats to Old Freedoms
So many throughout American history have fought and died to protect these “unalienable Rights.” Yet with each passing generation, these rights come under assault in new ways.
In our generation, we must press back against the spread of Chinese Communist Party–style digital totalitarianism around the world, including here at home. We must resist the creation of systems that use digital IDs, programmable digital money, and ubiquitous artificial intelligence to surveil, harvest, centralize—and ultimately weaponize—our private data.
The infrastructure for a global, CCP-style surveillance state is being built now. In the wrong hands, these tools could form the backbone of a “Digital Gulag,” in which every transaction, movement, and opinion can be monitored, scored, and controlled.
We oppose the surveillance systems of authoritarian regimes—not the people they rule. Every person, in every nation, is endowed by God with the same “unalienable Rights.”
Will the American Experiment End?
Will the freedom for which our forefathers and foremothers fought and died continue for another 250 years—or even another 50 years? Will the “American Experiment” in ordered liberty endure even for another generation?
The answer depends on what we do now.
The good news is that this future is not yet written. If we act with courage and clarity, we can ensure that our children and grandchildren inherit not a Digital Gulag, but the blessings of liberty.
Join the Fight for Freedom
We at Women’s Rights Without Frontiers and Anti-Globalist International are committed to continuing the battle to preserve our freedom and “unalienable Rights.” We defend women, families, and vulnerable communities from the human rights abuses enabled by digital authoritarianism, and we work to expose, educate, and build a global coalition to resist these systems.
Will you join us?
Here are three ways you can help today:
Stay informed and spread the word: Share this message with friends, family, and colleagues who care about human rights and freedom.
Speak up to your leaders: Contact your elected representatives and urge them to oppose digital ID mandates, central bank digital currencies, and mass-surveillance schemes that threaten our basic liberties.
Stand with us in this work: Support Women’s Rights Without Frontiers and Anti-Globalist International as we expose and oppose digital totalitarianism around the world.
Together, by God’s grace, we can ensure that the “unalienable Rights” proclaimed in 1776 are defended and preserved for generations to come.
Could the global rollout of Digital IDs lead to the spread of China’s Social Credit System?
Could the WHO’s push for the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) System lead to lab leaks, bioterrorist attacks and dangerous gain-of-function research?
I spoke with the great Tiffany Meier of the Epoch Times’ sister TV station, NTDTV, about all this and more.
Since this interview took place, the World Health Assembly chose not to vote on the PABS System, because the parties negotiating failed to reach agreement on key provisions. They are, however, continuing to press for a vote by the end of this year, so we cannot let up the pressure.
As you may know, I have been advocating vociferously for the release of jailed pro-democracy hero, Jimmy Lai. The risk to his life is immediate. Any further delay may amount to a death sentence. I am grateful to LifeSiteNews for publishing a feature article about my advocacy. Please read this article and help my efforts to spread the word by sharing it.
Today is the 37th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre. I have taken the opportunity to write an Open Letter to President Trump and Prime Minister Kier Starmer, advocating for them to take a more powerful role in securing his release. To sign the petition to free Jimmy Lai, clickHERE.
Dear President Trump and Prime Minister Starmer,
We write on behalf of concerned citizens from more than 30 countries who are calling for the immediate and unconditional release of Jimmy Lai.
On the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, we are reminded of the Chinese Communist Party’s longstanding record of repression. That tragedy compelled Jimmy Lai to dedicate his life to defending freedom and human dignity in Hong Kong. For this, he has been imprisoned under harsh and degrading conditions.
At 78, Mr. Lai’s health is in rapid decline. After more than five years in solitary confinement with minimal natural light, he is reportedly receiving inadequate treatment for serious medical conditions, including heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes. The risk to his life is immediate. Any further delay may amount to a death sentence.
We acknowledge President Trump’s stated commitment to securing Mr. Lai’s release and his decision to raise the case directly with President Xi Jinping. However, the absence of meaningful action from Beijing underscores the need for significantly stronger measures. Prime Minister Starmer, as the leader of Jimmy Lai’s country of citizenship, your government has both a moral obligation and a sovereign responsibility to act decisively.
We urge you both to escalate this matter to the highest diplomatic priority. Jimmy Lai’s continued detention should carry clear and tangible consequences in bilateral and multilateral engagements with the Chinese government. His case must be raised consistently and publicly and linked to concrete diplomatic and economic considerations. Silence or incrementalism at this stage risks signaling tolerance for grave human rights abuses.
Jimmy Lai’s imprisonment is not only an injustice against one man—it is a test of the international community’s resolve to defend fundamental freedoms. We urge you to act with urgency and resolve to secure his release while there is still time.
Sincerely,
Reggie Littlejohn, President
Women’s Rights Without Frontiers and Anti-Globalist International
On behalf of petition signatories from more than 30 countries
I will be speaking at the World Council for Health Better Way Conference on May 30-31, in Providence Rhode Island. This exciting conference will also feature:
Dr. Tess Lawrie (Founder and President of the World Council for Health) Del Bigtree Dr. Bret Weinstein Dr. Peter McCullough Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Mary Holland, Esq. Dr. Paul Marik Dr. Pierre Kory Jan Jekielek
The topic of the Conference is “Co-Creating Health Solutions: A Better Way for the USA.” The topic of my speech is “How to prevent global health from turning into global control.” I will speak on the dangers of the PABS System and Digital IDs.
Reggie’s interview on Lithuanian TVPress Conference with members of the Lithuanian and Estonian Parliaments and key activists from Lithuania and PolandReggie keynotes a Conference on the WHO and Digital IDs at the Lithuanian Parliament.
On May 7, 2026, I was scheduled to deliver an Address at the Plenary Session of the Lithuanian Parliament, to discuss the dangers of the World Health Organization’s Pandemic Treaty, as well as Digital IDs. I can’t tell you how thrilled I was about this. The opportunity to deliver a 30-minute Address at the Plenary Session of any Parliament – especially about these crucial issues — is the opportunity of a lifetime.
Those who had invited me, led by Member of the Lithuanian Parliament Rimas Jonas Jankunas, had met all the requirements. They had submitted more than sufficient signatures of Members of Parliament (in fact, they had submitted them twice!) so that scheduling my presentation and discussion was compulsory. Nevertheless, when I arrived at the Lithuanian Parliament in Vilnius on the morning of the Address, I learned that those in control of the schedule simply removed me and substituted another issue entirely — that very morning, just minutes before I was to deliver my Address!
Amazingly, when this happened, the sky suddenly broke out in a dramatic display of thunder and lightning!
The Lithuanian Parliament has been deprived of an opportunity to learn about and discuss two of the great issues of our age: the WHO Pandemic Treaty and Digital IDs. Perhaps even more important, a dangerous precedent has been set. Now, Members of the Lithuanian Parliament who have met all the requirements to get an issue on the schedule can be blocked by what Member Jankunas characterized as the “Deep State.” It is a sad day for freedom of speech in Lithuania!
All was not lost. I was able to speak at a Press Conference, along with Members of the Lithuanian and Estonian Parliaments, decrying the lawlessness of the Deep State.
I was then the Keynote Speaker at the Conference that followed. This Conference on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty and Digital IDs was attended by several Members of the Lithuanian Parliament, a Member of the Estonian Parliament, and key activists from Lithuania, Poland and Estonia.
Finally, I was interviewed on a major alternative Lithuanian news station. This interview was 90 minutes and I believe did much to introduce the Lithuanian public to these important issues.
Undeterred, last night I flew from Vilnius, Lithuania to Brussels, Belgium. Tomorrow I will present at the European Parliament about the dangers of the WHO’s PABS System. More on this in a separate newsletter.
Please keep me in your thoughts and prayers and consider donating to help me build a movement to defeat the international Deep State. I cannot do this alone, and I need resources to mount a credible challenge the impending New World Order – which has much of the media and immense financial resources in its pocket.
