In this compelling interview with Peter Demos, I discuss the dangers of AI, Digital IDs, CBDCs and the rising threat of global control through an international Chinese-style social credit system. I also explain the WHO’s new Pandemic Treaty and its Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing System, which greatly increases the risks of lab leaks and bio-terrorist attacks.
The interview has already caught on, with more than 40,000 views on Rumble. Please help it go viral by watching, liking and sharing it. Please help me to get this message out!
Watch MK Limor son Har-Melech’s Remarks HERE (2 mins)
Watch Yehonatan Segev and Heidi Moses HERE (1 min)
Watch Reggie’s Remarks at the Israeli Knesset HERE (6 mins)
Dear Friend,
Joining the United States, Israel has rejected the WHO’s 2024 International Health Regulation Amendments! This is a huge victory!
As you may recall, I spoke twice at the Israeli Knesset on this issue, the first time via video and the second time in person. I traveled from Washington, DC to Jerusalem to speak at the Knesset for three minutes. It’s the longest distance I have ever traveled to speak for the least amount of time, but it was worth it.
The Knesset heard our message and rejected the WHO’s IHR Amendments as a threat to national sovereignty and to medical freedom.
I am truly humbled that in their announcements of Israel’s decision, Knesset members Ariel Kallner and Limor Son Har-Melech thanked me by name. Knesset Member Ariel Kallner stated, “I would also like to take this opportunity to express my deep appreciation for Reggie Littlejohn and the Sovereignty Coalition, who have been a source of inspiration and vital partnership in this global effort. Their unwavering commitment to freedom and sovereignty has strengthened democratic resistance to international overreach.”
Knesset Member Limor Son Har-Melech said, “Thank you, Reggie, for coming to Israel and making an impact at the important [Health] Committee in the Knesset. Thank you for what you are doing for humanity. I bless you from Israel.”
Also, the key Israeli organizers, Heidi Moses and Yehonatan Segev, sent me a video from the Knesset, thanking me for my role in Israel’s decision, saying, “You see what you did? It’s a lot because of you.”
As much as I am humbled by their gratitude, this tremendous victory belongs to all who worked so hard to bring it about, including Israel’s Minister of Health, Uriel Busso, Knesset members Ariel Kallner and Limor Son Har-Melech, and Yehonatan Segev and Heidi Moses, whose sacrificial labor was absolutely instrumental in the success of this effort. Thanks also to the many Israeli and international activists, including Philipp Kruse and members of the Sovereignty Coalition, for their important contributions as well.
According to publicly available documentation, the United States, Israel and Italy are the only clearly confirmed nations that have officially rejected the WHO’s 2024 IHR Amendments. Several countries have an extended deadline (until March 2026) to reject the 2024 Amendments, because of their earlier rejection of the 2022 Amendments.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. spoke directly to the American people in a powerful video, unequivocally rejecting the Amendments to the International Health Regulations of the WHO. Referencing the system of global digital IDs, surveillance and censorship advanced by the IHR Amendments, Secretary Kennedy stated: “Are we going to be subjects to a technocratic control system that uses health risks and pandemic preparedness as a Trojan horse to curtail basic democratic freedoms? Do we want a future every person, movement, transaction, and every human body is under surveillance at all times?”
I applaud Sec. Kennedy’s courage in calling out the WHO for what it is: A Trojan horse. As I have been saying for years, under the pretext of health safety and pandemic response, the WHO’s amended IHRs create the framework for a biotech surveillance police state. The WHO failed miserably during Covid, and the last thing the world needs is to give them the additional authority they seek through these Amendments. The world does not need global health IDs, vaccine passports, surveillance and censorship of dissenting views as “misinformation” and “disinformation.” These measures will lead to global governance in which our democratic freedoms can be crushed. Rather, the world needs a consortium of countries freely collaborating to address international health challenges.
This victory was a team effort. Congratulations to all who have worked so hard to bring this day about, especially my friends and colleagues at Anti-Globalist International and Sovereignty Coalition.
We have launched Anti-Globalist International, a major project of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, with a powerful, International Summit: Reject the WHO and the Globalist Coup! This summit gathered perhaps the world’s foremost authorities on the corruption of the WHO, as well as the dangers it poses to our national sovereignty and personal freedom. The 30 panelists included such luminaries and Christine Anderson (MEP from Germany), Alex Newman, Dr. Jessica Rose and Astrid Stuckelberger. The Israeli contingent was strong in showing the world how they successfully persuaded Israel to reject the Amended International Health Regulations. Activists from as far away as Japan, India, Australia and New Zealand participated, even though it was the middle of the night for them. This Summit has launched an international movement to resist global governance by unelected, unaccountable, incompetent bureaucrats!
We are thrilled to launch Anti-Globalist International – a project of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers – with a Summit of world leaders, who are coming together tomorrow (Tuesday) to urge the rejection of the pernicious Amended International Health Regulations.
The World Health Organization’s amended International Health Regulations threaten national sovereignty, require nations to censor their citizens for “misinformation” and “disinformation,” and support the rollout of an international digital ID that could be used as the technical platform for the imposition of a Chinese-style social credit system worldwide. July 19, 2025, is the last day for nations to reject these amended IHRs.
Meanwhile, the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty approved in May, 2025, sets up the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing System (PABS) to “promot[e] the rapid and timely sharing of ‘materials and sequence information on pathogens with pandemic potential.’” (Article 12). This system will concentrate all the world’s most deadly pathogens into the hands of unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party and the pharmaceutical industry – the same globalist functionaries who so seriously botched the WHO’s response to Covid-19. The WHO may then share them with labs all over the world, ostensibly to develop vaccines, diagnostics and other treatments. This system poses a significant risk of escalating the chances of pandemics caused by lab leaks, as well as bio-terrorist attacks. Although the United States and Argentina have withdrawn from the WHO, they will still be affected by the pandemics generated by the PABS System.
On Tuesday, July 15, at 11:00 – 1:30 EDT (New York time), join an eminent panel of international experts who will gather on Zoom to expose the dangers of these WHO agreements and discuss what you can do to stop them.
What: An international anti-globalist summit to reject the WHO’s IHR Amendments
When: Tuesday, July 15 from 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
I appeared via big-screen video yesterday at a rally against the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulation Amendments, held in downtown Vienna, Austria. While the U.S. is in the process of leaving the WHO, other nations need to opt out of these pernicious Amendments by the deadline of July 19, 2025. Watch my 3-minute remarks, in which I discuss all my top reasons that nations should opt out of the IHR amendments – censorship, surveillance, damage to national sovereignty, and digital IDs possibly leading to a Chinese-style Social Credit System. It’s the most concise critique of the IHR amendments I know of!
I was honored to be asked to address the recent Pan-African Conference on Family Values, Religious Freedom and National Sovereignty, in Nairobi, Kenya. The title of my video presentation is, “The Family and the Dangers of Globalism.” In it, I talk about my journey from opposing forced abortion and saving baby girls in China to exposing the attempted globalist threat against our freedom, by the World Health Organization and other globalist entities. For those who think this is a conspiracy theory, watch this video, in which I show clips of the globalists themselves telling us what they are doing.
As you may know, an Amendent to the Big Beautiful Bill proposed a 10-year moratorium on the state regulation of AI – a violation of states’ rights and a recipe for disaster. The states have the right and the duty to protect their citizens from runaway AI. Due to pushback – including ours – the Senate is now considering a compromise amendment (proposed by Senators Cruz and Blackburn) that would enact a 5-year moratorium, with certain carveouts.
A five-year moratorium on state regulation of AI will not resolve any of the issues posed by a 10-year moratorium.This amendment will likely be voted upon in the next day or two.
Please watch this powerful interview discussing the reasons the states need to retain their power to regulate AI. This is a crucial states rights issue.
Also, please TAKE ACTION HEREto let your representatives know that the Cruz/Blackburn amendment will not resolve the problems of the moratorium.
BREAKING NEWS – This situation is extremely fluid, as the Senate’s Vote-o-Rama on Amendments has begun. Just as we were about to send out this newsletter, we learned that Senator Blackburn has pulled her support for the compromise she reached with Senator Cruz. According to a report by Politico, she stated, ““While I appreciate Chairman Cruz’s efforts to find acceptable language that allows states to protect their citizens from the abuses of AI, the current language is not acceptable to those who need these protections the most.”
Our message is having an impact!!
We don’t know whether Senator Cruz is still advancing the Cruz/Blackburn compromise, without Senator Blackburn’s support. Right now, everything is up in the air, which means that we have a chance for a decisive victory, if we act now. We still need to take action to get the moratorium expunged completely from the Big Beautiful Bill. I believe the Senate may be discussing it at this very moment!
We are grateful that, on his first day in office, President Trump gave notice to the World Health Organization that the U.S. is withdrawing. This withdrawal, however, will not take effect until January, 2026. Meanwhile, if you think that this action protects the U.S. from the threats posed by the WHO, think again.
For example, being out of the WHO will not protect us against pandemics generated by the crazed new system of pathogen sharing created by the Pandemic Treaty, which was adopted by the World Health Assembly in May, 2025. Under this new system, countries will be rewarded for finding deadly pathogens and sending them to the WHO. The WHO, in turn, will farm them out to labs all over the world, greatly increasing the chances of lab leaks and bioterrorist attacks. The US will not be immune from the stream of pandemics that will likely be generated, as pathogens know no borders.
Also, the new Pandemic Agreement requires nations to “prevent misinformation [and] disinformation” – shutting down freedom of speech. “Misinformation” and “disinformation” are not defined in the Pandemic Agreement, but experience during Covid-19 demonstrates that these terms refer to opinions that run contrary to the official narrative of the WHO. The WHO’s prohibition of dissenting voices will affect Americans, as our speech on social media (Facebook, X, etc.) reaches other countries. How does the WHO propose to “prevent” us from voicing views that are contrary to the WHO’s official narrative?
Thanks to Real America’s Voice and Jeff Crouere for this powerful interview.
As you may know, the U.S. and Argentina have withdrawn from the WHO. In this Epoch Times / NTDTV interview, host Stefania Cox asks my views regarding whether this withdrawal could cause a domino effect, with other countries also withdrawing from the WHO. I also discuss the reasons that the WHO Pandemic Treaty will still affect the United States and Argentina, even though we have withdrawn. Finally, I give my views on RFK Jr.’s plan for the U.S. and Argentina to form an international health initiative with the countries that have withdrawn from the WHO. All these issues are critical to our time!
