We have launched Anti-Globalist International, a major project of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, with a powerful, International Summit: Reject the WHO and the Globalist Coup! This summit gathered perhaps the world’s foremost authorities on the corruption of the WHO, as well as the dangers it poses to our national sovereignty and personal freedom. The 30 panelists included such luminaries and Christine Anderson (MEP from Germany), Alex Newman, Dr. Jessica Rose and Astrid Stuckelberger. The Israeli contingent was strong in showing the world how they successfully persuaded Israel to reject the Amended International Health Regulations. Activists from as far away as Japan, India, Australia and New Zealand participated, even though it was the middle of the night for them. This Summit has launched an international movement to resist global governance by unelected, unaccountable, incompetent bureaucrats!
We are thrilled to launch Anti-Globalist International – a project of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers – with a Summit of world leaders, who are coming together tomorrow (Tuesday) to urge the rejection of the pernicious Amended International Health Regulations.
The World Health Organization’s amended International Health Regulations threaten national sovereignty, require nations to censor their citizens for “misinformation” and “disinformation,” and support the rollout of an international digital ID that could be used as the technical platform for the imposition of a Chinese-style social credit system worldwide. July 19, 2025, is the last day for nations to reject these amended IHRs.
Meanwhile, the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty approved in May, 2025, sets up the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing System (PABS) to “promot[e] the rapid and timely sharing of ‘materials and sequence information on pathogens with pandemic potential.’” (Article 12). This system will concentrate all the world’s most deadly pathogens into the hands of unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats under the influence of the Chinese Communist Party and the pharmaceutical industry – the same globalist functionaries who so seriously botched the WHO’s response to Covid-19. The WHO may then share them with labs all over the world, ostensibly to develop vaccines, diagnostics and other treatments. This system poses a significant risk of escalating the chances of pandemics caused by lab leaks, as well as bio-terrorist attacks. Although the United States and Argentina have withdrawn from the WHO, they will still be affected by the pandemics generated by the PABS System.
On Tuesday, July 15, at 11:00 – 1:30 EDT (New York time), join an eminent panel of international experts who will gather on Zoom to expose the dangers of these WHO agreements and discuss what you can do to stop them.
What: An international anti-globalist summit to reject the WHO’s IHR Amendments
When: Tuesday, July 15 from 11:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
I appeared via big-screen video yesterday at a rally against the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulation Amendments, held in downtown Vienna, Austria. While the U.S. is in the process of leaving the WHO, other nations need to opt out of these pernicious Amendments by the deadline of July 19, 2025. Watch my 3-minute remarks, in which I discuss all my top reasons that nations should opt out of the IHR amendments – censorship, surveillance, damage to national sovereignty, and digital IDs possibly leading to a Chinese-style Social Credit System. It’s the most concise critique of the IHR amendments I know of!
I was honored to be asked to address the recent Pan-African Conference on Family Values, Religious Freedom and National Sovereignty, in Nairobi, Kenya. The title of my video presentation is, “The Family and the Dangers of Globalism.” In it, I talk about my journey from opposing forced abortion and saving baby girls in China to exposing the attempted globalist threat against our freedom, by the World Health Organization and other globalist entities. For those who think this is a conspiracy theory, watch this video, in which I show clips of the globalists themselves telling us what they are doing.
As you may know, an Amendent to the Big Beautiful Bill proposed a 10-year moratorium on the state regulation of AI – a violation of states’ rights and a recipe for disaster. The states have the right and the duty to protect their citizens from runaway AI. Due to pushback – including ours – the Senate is now considering a compromise amendment (proposed by Senators Cruz and Blackburn) that would enact a 5-year moratorium, with certain carveouts.
A five-year moratorium on state regulation of AI will not resolve any of the issues posed by a 10-year moratorium.This amendment will likely be voted upon in the next day or two.
Please watch this powerful interview discussing the reasons the states need to retain their power to regulate AI. This is a crucial states rights issue.
Also, please TAKE ACTION HEREto let your representatives know that the Cruz/Blackburn amendment will not resolve the problems of the moratorium.
BREAKING NEWS – This situation is extremely fluid, as the Senate’s Vote-o-Rama on Amendments has begun. Just as we were about to send out this newsletter, we learned that Senator Blackburn has pulled her support for the compromise she reached with Senator Cruz. According to a report by Politico, she stated, ““While I appreciate Chairman Cruz’s efforts to find acceptable language that allows states to protect their citizens from the abuses of AI, the current language is not acceptable to those who need these protections the most.”
Our message is having an impact!!
We don’t know whether Senator Cruz is still advancing the Cruz/Blackburn compromise, without Senator Blackburn’s support. Right now, everything is up in the air, which means that we have a chance for a decisive victory, if we act now. We still need to take action to get the moratorium expunged completely from the Big Beautiful Bill. I believe the Senate may be discussing it at this very moment!
We are grateful that, on his first day in office, President Trump gave notice to the World Health Organization that the U.S. is withdrawing. This withdrawal, however, will not take effect until January, 2026. Meanwhile, if you think that this action protects the U.S. from the threats posed by the WHO, think again.
For example, being out of the WHO will not protect us against pandemics generated by the crazed new system of pathogen sharing created by the Pandemic Treaty, which was adopted by the World Health Assembly in May, 2025. Under this new system, countries will be rewarded for finding deadly pathogens and sending them to the WHO. The WHO, in turn, will farm them out to labs all over the world, greatly increasing the chances of lab leaks and bioterrorist attacks. The US will not be immune from the stream of pandemics that will likely be generated, as pathogens know no borders.
Also, the new Pandemic Agreement requires nations to “prevent misinformation [and] disinformation” – shutting down freedom of speech. “Misinformation” and “disinformation” are not defined in the Pandemic Agreement, but experience during Covid-19 demonstrates that these terms refer to opinions that run contrary to the official narrative of the WHO. The WHO’s prohibition of dissenting voices will affect Americans, as our speech on social media (Facebook, X, etc.) reaches other countries. How does the WHO propose to “prevent” us from voicing views that are contrary to the WHO’s official narrative?
Thanks to Real America’s Voice and Jeff Crouere for this powerful interview.
As you may know, the U.S. and Argentina have withdrawn from the WHO. In this Epoch Times / NTDTV interview, host Stefania Cox asks my views regarding whether this withdrawal could cause a domino effect, with other countries also withdrawing from the WHO. I also discuss the reasons that the WHO Pandemic Treaty will still affect the United States and Argentina, even though we have withdrawn. Finally, I give my views on RFK Jr.’s plan for the U.S. and Argentina to form an international health initiative with the countries that have withdrawn from the WHO. All these issues are critical to our time!
About a year ago, I was contacted by author Bruce Licht to write an “elevator pitch for God.” His project was to produce a website answering the question, “Why do so many intelligent people believe in God?” In it, he has included one-page essays from dozens of thought leaders on why we believe. I felt honored to be included among such diverse luminaries as Dennis Prager, Larry Elder and Frank Pavone. I had the inestimable privilege of working with Mother Teresa for six weeks between my second and third years at Yale Law School. This experience changed my life. I thought you would enjoy reading my short testimony about how Mother Teresa convinced me of the existence of God.
The World Health Organization’s annual Assembly is scheduled to vote on the pernicious Pandemic Treaty tomorrow. Since Geneva is six to nine hours ahead of the continental United States, by the time most of us wake up tomorrow morning, the Pandemic Treaty may already have been adopted.
It is a tremendous thing that President Trump withdrew us from the World Health Organization. Nevertheless, the Treaty will affect us, regardless, for reasons I discuss in this interview. If the WHO is successful in rolling out international, interoperable Digital IDs, then U.S. citizens who want to travel overseas may be required to have one. Any mandatory digital ID can serve as the technical platform for a China Social Credit System-type surveillance state.
Further, the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) System set up by the Pandemic Treaty requires pathogens to be sent to labs all over the world, greatly increasing the chances of lab leaks. These leaks can start pandemics that will affect the United States, regardless of whether we are members of the WHO. Pathogens and pandemics know no borders.
The Pandemic Treaty is dangerous on numerous fronts, and we need to continue to expose and oppose it, internationally. Even though the Treaty will likely be adopted tomorrow, it will not be open for signature until after the Annex articulating the details of the PABS system is also adopted – probably at the World Health Assembly in May of 2026. One report states: “According to Steven Solomon, the WHO’s principal legal officer, if member states adopt the PABS annex at the 2026 World Health Assembly, it may be another ‘year to year and a half’ for the treaty to receive the required 60 ratifications by member states and come into force.”
More countries need to withdraw from the WHO. All is not lost. We have time. Please watch and share this video and remain engaged in the battle.
I was truly humbled to receive an invitation to speak in person at the Knesset in Jerusalem, in support of their debate on whether to leave the World Health Organization. It was the longest trip I’ve ever taken to speak for the shortest amount of time. Why would I travel about 40 hours roundtrip to speak for three minutes?
I did this because I have friends in Israel who have been working their hearts out with very little support, because of their powerful conviction that Israel must leave the WHO. They have many reasons to do so, and the debate at the Knesset’s Health Committee was intense. I wanted to do whatever I could to support their efforts.
As President of Anti-Globalist International and Co-Founder of the Sovereignty Coalition (both projects of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers), I have closely analyzed the dangers of the Amended International Health Regulations, which passed last June. These require nations to surveil their citizens and “address” (censor?) “misinformation and disinformation.” The World Health Organization has been rolling out international, interoperable Digital IDs, which can serve as the platform for a world-wide system akin to the Chinese Social Credit System. The Pandemic Treaty, which will be voted upon this May, only adds to the hazards created by the WHO. The debate at the Knesset went well and will likely continue. If Israel were to withdraw from the WHO, they would be the third nation to do so, after the United States and Argentina. Hopefully, their brave action would inspire other nations to take courage and withdraw from this corrupt organization as well. #ExitTheWHO!
