I was honored to be asked to address the recent Pan-African Conference on Family Values, Religious Freedom and National Sovereignty, in Nairobi, Kenya. The title of my video presentation is, “The Family and the Dangers of Globalism.” In it, I talk about my journey from opposing forced abortion and saving baby girls in China to exposing the attempted globalist threat against our freedom, by the World Health Organization and other globalist entities. For those who think this is a conspiracy theory, watch this video, in which I show clips of the globalists themselves telling us what they are doing.
As you may know, an Amendent to the Big Beautiful Bill proposed a 10-year moratorium on the state regulation of AI – a violation of states’ rights and a recipe for disaster. The states have the right and the duty to protect their citizens from runaway AI. Due to pushback – including ours – the Senate is now considering a compromise amendment (proposed by Senators Cruz and Blackburn) that would enact a 5-year moratorium, with certain carveouts.
A five-year moratorium on state regulation of AI will not resolve any of the issues posed by a 10-year moratorium.This amendment will likely be voted upon in the next day or two.
Please watch this powerful interview discussing the reasons the states need to retain their power to regulate AI. This is a crucial states rights issue.
Also, please TAKE ACTION HEREto let your representatives know that the Cruz/Blackburn amendment will not resolve the problems of the moratorium.
BREAKING NEWS – This situation is extremely fluid, as the Senate’s Vote-o-Rama on Amendments has begun. Just as we were about to send out this newsletter, we learned that Senator Blackburn has pulled her support for the compromise she reached with Senator Cruz. According to a report by Politico, she stated, ““While I appreciate Chairman Cruz’s efforts to find acceptable language that allows states to protect their citizens from the abuses of AI, the current language is not acceptable to those who need these protections the most.”
Our message is having an impact!!
We don’t know whether Senator Cruz is still advancing the Cruz/Blackburn compromise, without Senator Blackburn’s support. Right now, everything is up in the air, which means that we have a chance for a decisive victory, if we act now. We still need to take action to get the moratorium expunged completely from the Big Beautiful Bill. I believe the Senate may be discussing it at this very moment!
We are grateful that, on his first day in office, President Trump gave notice to the World Health Organization that the U.S. is withdrawing. This withdrawal, however, will not take effect until January, 2026. Meanwhile, if you think that this action protects the U.S. from the threats posed by the WHO, think again.
For example, being out of the WHO will not protect us against pandemics generated by the crazed new system of pathogen sharing created by the Pandemic Treaty, which was adopted by the World Health Assembly in May, 2025. Under this new system, countries will be rewarded for finding deadly pathogens and sending them to the WHO. The WHO, in turn, will farm them out to labs all over the world, greatly increasing the chances of lab leaks and bioterrorist attacks. The US will not be immune from the stream of pandemics that will likely be generated, as pathogens know no borders.
Also, the new Pandemic Agreement requires nations to “prevent misinformation [and] disinformation” – shutting down freedom of speech. “Misinformation” and “disinformation” are not defined in the Pandemic Agreement, but experience during Covid-19 demonstrates that these terms refer to opinions that run contrary to the official narrative of the WHO. The WHO’s prohibition of dissenting voices will affect Americans, as our speech on social media (Facebook, X, etc.) reaches other countries. How does the WHO propose to “prevent” us from voicing views that are contrary to the WHO’s official narrative?
Thanks to Real America’s Voice and Jeff Crouere for this powerful interview.
As you may know, the U.S. and Argentina have withdrawn from the WHO. In this Epoch Times / NTDTV interview, host Stefania Cox asks my views regarding whether this withdrawal could cause a domino effect, with other countries also withdrawing from the WHO. I also discuss the reasons that the WHO Pandemic Treaty will still affect the United States and Argentina, even though we have withdrawn. Finally, I give my views on RFK Jr.’s plan for the U.S. and Argentina to form an international health initiative with the countries that have withdrawn from the WHO. All these issues are critical to our time!
About a year ago, I was contacted by author Bruce Licht to write an “elevator pitch for God.” His project was to produce a website answering the question, “Why do so many intelligent people believe in God?” In it, he has included one-page essays from dozens of thought leaders on why we believe. I felt honored to be included among such diverse luminaries as Dennis Prager, Larry Elder and Frank Pavone. I had the inestimable privilege of working with Mother Teresa for six weeks between my second and third years at Yale Law School. This experience changed my life. I thought you would enjoy reading my short testimony about how Mother Teresa convinced me of the existence of God.
The World Health Organization’s annual Assembly is scheduled to vote on the pernicious Pandemic Treaty tomorrow. Since Geneva is six to nine hours ahead of the continental United States, by the time most of us wake up tomorrow morning, the Pandemic Treaty may already have been adopted.
It is a tremendous thing that President Trump withdrew us from the World Health Organization. Nevertheless, the Treaty will affect us, regardless, for reasons I discuss in this interview. If the WHO is successful in rolling out international, interoperable Digital IDs, then U.S. citizens who want to travel overseas may be required to have one. Any mandatory digital ID can serve as the technical platform for a China Social Credit System-type surveillance state.
Further, the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) System set up by the Pandemic Treaty requires pathogens to be sent to labs all over the world, greatly increasing the chances of lab leaks. These leaks can start pandemics that will affect the United States, regardless of whether we are members of the WHO. Pathogens and pandemics know no borders.
The Pandemic Treaty is dangerous on numerous fronts, and we need to continue to expose and oppose it, internationally. Even though the Treaty will likely be adopted tomorrow, it will not be open for signature until after the Annex articulating the details of the PABS system is also adopted – probably at the World Health Assembly in May of 2026. One report states: “According to Steven Solomon, the WHO’s principal legal officer, if member states adopt the PABS annex at the 2026 World Health Assembly, it may be another ‘year to year and a half’ for the treaty to receive the required 60 ratifications by member states and come into force.”
More countries need to withdraw from the WHO. All is not lost. We have time. Please watch and share this video and remain engaged in the battle.
I was truly humbled to receive an invitation to speak in person at the Knesset in Jerusalem, in support of their debate on whether to leave the World Health Organization. It was the longest trip I’ve ever taken to speak for the shortest amount of time. Why would I travel about 40 hours roundtrip to speak for three minutes?
I did this because I have friends in Israel who have been working their hearts out with very little support, because of their powerful conviction that Israel must leave the WHO. They have many reasons to do so, and the debate at the Knesset’s Health Committee was intense. I wanted to do whatever I could to support their efforts.
As President of Anti-Globalist International and Co-Founder of the Sovereignty Coalition (both projects of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers), I have closely analyzed the dangers of the Amended International Health Regulations, which passed last June. These require nations to surveil their citizens and “address” (censor?) “misinformation and disinformation.” The World Health Organization has been rolling out international, interoperable Digital IDs, which can serve as the platform for a world-wide system akin to the Chinese Social Credit System. The Pandemic Treaty, which will be voted upon this May, only adds to the hazards created by the WHO. The debate at the Knesset went well and will likely continue. If Israel were to withdraw from the WHO, they would be the third nation to do so, after the United States and Argentina. Hopefully, their brave action would inspire other nations to take courage and withdraw from this corrupt organization as well. #ExitTheWHO!
I have been working closely with a powerful group connected to the Knesset in Israel, in an effort to educate the Knesset on the corruption, incompetence and dangerous policies of the World Health Organization. Our efforts are having an impact. The Knesset Health Committee met yesterday to debate exiting the WHO. I was honored (indeed, astonished!) to be invited to deliver remarks. Later, I was told that I was the only person not from Israel to speak. While I was invited to speak in person, I could not travel to Israel last minute, so I sent a video. I understand from those who were present that the debate went well and that several members of the Health Committee rose up strongly to urge Israel to exit the WHO.
China: Sex-Selective Abortion of Baby Girls Remains Rampant for Third Children – 133 Boys for Every 100 Girls Born: Report
The Congressional-Executive Commission on China released a startling statistic in its most recent annual report: “Data published this past year showed on average, boy-preference for couples having a third child, with 133 boys born for every 100 girls, across China.” 2024CECC Report, pp 155. See also pp. 160 and 166. Such a vast gender imbalance cannot be achieved naturally. It can only be achieved through the sex-selective abortion of baby girls – through gendercide.
The report does not provide a statistic on how many third children are born in China each year. It is, therefore, not possible to determine how many female third children were selectively aborted because of their gender. The report does, however, state that in 2023, there were an estimated 30 million more males living in China than females. This gender imbalance in turn is a powerful, driving force behind human trafficking and sexual slavery, in China and the surrounding countries.
The confluence of four factors has resulted in the selective abortion of 30 million baby girls: son-preference; coercive low birth limits (under the one, two and three-child policies); the availability of ultrasound to determine the sex of a fetus; and easy access to abortion.
March 8 marks International Women’s Day. This year’s theme is “For ALL Women and Girls: Rights. Equality. Empowerment.” The United Nations website states, “Central to this vision is empowering the next generation — youth, particularly young women and adolescent girls—as catalysts for lasting change.” However, gendercide – the most violent form of gender discrimination – is not mentioned as a factor in disempowering“the next generation” of women and girls, by selectively terminating them.
As early as 1990, a Nobel Prize winning economist estimated that there were 100 million women missing in the world at that time. More recent estimates rise to 160 million, or as high as 200 million – a figure that rivals all the casualties of all the wars of the blood-soaked 20th century. Truly, gendercide is the real war on women.
2025 is particularly pivotal, as it marks the 30th anniversary of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action. This Declaration, according to the UN website, “is the most progressive and widely endorsed blueprint for women’s and girls’ rights worldwide.”
The Beijing Declaration contains the following language:
[Paragraph] 115. Acts of violence against women also include forced sterilization and forced abortion, coercive/forced use of contraceptives, female infanticide and prenatal sex selection.
Today in China, pre-natal sex selection is widely practiced; unmarried women and fourth children can still be forcibly aborted; and forced abortion and sterilization are still likely used to control disfavored minorities such as ethnic Tibetans and Uighurs. According to the Beijing Declaration – which China signed, as the host country – these are “acts of violence against women.”
And yet, during the past 30 years – indeed, since the inception of the One Child Policy in 1980 — the women of China have been brutalized by the Chinese Communist Party. Neither the Beijing Declaration nor International Women’s Day has done anything to stop this.
Any restriction on births is a violation of women’s rights, and we call upon the Chinese Communist Party to end all coercive population control, including in Tibet and Xinjiang.
We also call upon the CCP to take effective action to save baby girls. It can be done. We know this because Women’s Rights Without Frontiers is doing it. We are the only organization with a network inside China that has saved hundreds of baby girls from sex-selective abortion, abandonment and extreme poverty. By lifting up the equal dignity of the girl child and providing emotional and financial support, son-preference can be abated, and millions of precious baby girls can be given the chance to draw breath on the face of this earth.
Learn more about our “Save a Girl” campaign in China HERE.//
As you know, we worked for years to build the movement to exit the World Health Organization. You can imagine our elation when President Trump withdrew us, as promised, on Day One of his presidency.
Very shortly thereafter, however, he made a comment that he might rejoin if they would “clean it up.”
We believe that the WHO cannot be cleaned up, but was corrupt from its inception. Consider, for example, the following quote from the first Director General of the WHO, Brock Chisholm:
“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.”
An organization founded upon such principles cannot be reformed. We urge President Trump to remain steadfast to his campaign promise to withdraw the U.S. from the WHO, “which deserves to be completely abolished.”
Thanks to Jeff Crouere and Real America’s Voice for another great interview!
