Lockdowns. Masks. Vaccine mandates. Vaccine passports/digital health IDs. Is the endgame establishing a social credit system like in China? Join Dr. Robert Malone, John Leake (co-author with Dr. Peter McCullough of The Courage to Face Covid-19,) Frank Gaffney and me in:
While China now operates under a Three-Child Policy, the legacy of the One Child Policy remains crippling. Watch this powerful, 8-minute interview of Reggie by Tiffany Meier of New Tang Dynasty TV, where Reggie discusses the 400 million babies that never saw the light of day because of forced abortion and sterilization. This coercive low birth limit, combined with son preference, led to rampant sex-selective abortion of baby girls. This in turn led to a severe gender imbalance, with 30 to 40 million more men living in China than women. Now, China is one of the world’s worst offenders in human trafficking and sexual slavery.
The interview ends on a hopeful note: how we are helping the situation with our Save a Girl and Save a Widow campaigns.
Katalina, one of the widows we are saving in Uganda.
I am overjoyed to announce that we are now saving widows in Uganda! This is a significant expansion of our efforts to help destitute, elderly widows live their lives with dignity. Learn more HERE.
People think of us when they think of China. Our Save a Girl and Save a Widow Campaigns in China are flourishing and we seek to expand those campaigns as well. But we are “Women’s Rights Without Frontiers.” We are not limited to China. We can help at-risk women and girls anywhere in the world!
So, why Uganda? Years ago, I traveled to Uganda, and was heartbroken to see the plight of widows there. I am grateful to have developed a strong relationship of trust with our faithful partners in Uganda, whom I have known for more than 15 years.
The challenges of Ugandan widows are very different from those of Chinese widows. In China, the One Child Policy has decimated the family structure, leaving no one to care for destitute widows. In Uganda, infant and child mortality have caused widows to be abandoned. One of our widows gave birth to ten children, and only one survived to adulthood! Not only was she destitute, but she was also utterly heartbroken, grieving the deaths of her nine children!
AIDS is a huge problem in Uganda. Many men have died of AIDS. Some of their widows were infected with HIV, and they have no money to buy needed medication.
Our Ugandan fieldworkers visit our widows once a month to check in on them, to encourage them, and to give them $25, to help them eat better and perhaps buy some medication. I hope you will consider donating to support these dear women, who have no one else to turn to.
Illiteracy is also rampant in the Ugandan countryside among the elderly. We ask our widows to sign a form each month verifying that they received the funds donated for them. More than half of these widows cannot write their names, but “sign” with a thumbprint!
We now have 30 widows in our program. With your help, we can expand this number and help more widows in desperate need! To learn more, please click HERE.
If you would like your donation to be restricted to “Save a Widow – Uganda,” just send me a reply email making that request.
Healthy young children and babies are at virtually no risk for severe COVID. In my opinion, injecting infants and toddlers with an experimental gene therapy whose long-term effects are unknown is beyond outrageous. No data exists regarding how the injections might affect long-term immune function, fertility, or possible cardiac issues, such as myocarditis. We simply do not know how these injections will affect babies and children long term. It is therefore unconscionable to inject them. We must stop these jabs from being mandated by states and from being included on the childhood vaccination schedule!
You can hear my primary remarks, with an introduction from my co-host, Frank Gaffney, from 3:30 to 10:40.
I have further remarks late in the webinar, at 1:52:33 to1:54:56, in which I draw a connection between vaxxing infants and the imposition of a vaccine passport/digital health ID/smart health card. These could be used to track — and ultimately, to control –people from infancy, building the China Social Credit System into the American healthcare system.
The FDA and CDC approved Covid-19 injections for babies and children as young as 6-months old, under an Emergency Use Authorization. The FDA and CDC did this despite the fact that healthy infants and children of this age are at virtually no risk of hospitalization or death from Covid. Meanwhile, no data exists regarding how the injections might affect long-term immune function, fertility, or possible cardiac issues, such as myocarditis. No data exists regarding whether injecting a Covid-recovered child could compromise that child’s natural immunity, or worse, cause potentially deadly antibody-dependent enhancement, or ADE.
What is the point of this irrational push to inject babies? Is it part of a larger plan to get Covid injections on the childhood vaccination schedule, in order to shield vaccine manufacturers from liability for injury and death, for any age group? Or, is it a pretext to issue vaccine passports/smart health cards/digital health IDs to babies and young children, so that they may be tracked and surveilled from infancy? Vaccine passports may be used as tools of mass surveillance and totalitarian control, similar to China’s Social Credit System.
We must stop these jabs from being mandated by states and from being included on the childhood vaccination schedule!
This webinar will be hosted by the Stop Vaccine Passports Task Force, co-sponsored by Women’s Rights Without Frontiers and the Committee on the Present Danger: China.
I have been sounding the alarm as loud as I can regarding the FDA’s approval of Covid vaccines for children as young as 6 months old, and the World Health Organization’s apparent plan to impose global surveillance outlined in its “Zero Draft” report. Please take the time to watch my TV interview with Frank Gaffney on Real America’s Voice/Securing America TV (12 minutes), and listen to my Radio interview with John Batchelor (9 minutes). Also, in case you missed it, I am including the link to my original analysis of the WHO “Zero Draft Report” – the most dangerous report you’ve never heard of.
WATCH my interview on vaccines for babies, and the WHO “Digital Gulag” HERE.
LISTEN to my interview on the John Batchelor Show, entitled “#WHO: #Covid-19: The UN plans for global health surveillance of citizens & What is to be done?” HERE.
READ my analysis of the dangerous WHO “Zero Draft Report” HERE.
Surveillance Cameras on a Street Corner in China (iStock – credit: sinology)
A World Health Organization working group has quietly released a “Zero Draft Report” to recommend actions to govern worldwide preparedness and response to “public health emergencies,” including but not limited to pandemics. Disguised in opaque language that sounds benign or even banal, it’s the most dangerous report you’ve never heard of.
The “proposed actions” recommended in the Zero Draft report, if followed, would destroy essential freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution: freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly. These proposed actions would threaten our very sovereignty as a nation, as well as the sovereignty of nations the world over.
Released on May 3, 2022, the Zero Draft Report of the Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response to Health Emergencies (the “Working Group”) has recommended that the WHO construct what amounts to a global infrastructure of surveillance and control that would likely depend on finding pandemics and other health events in order to justify its existence. Under the pretext of protecting our health, this infrastructure could easily be used to identify and silence dissenters, similar to the Chinese Social Credit System.
The upcoming proposed Pandemic Treaty and Amendments to the International Health Regulations, currently being drafted by new working groups at the WHO, will likely follow these “proposed actions.” Freedom loving Americans and people the world over need to vigorously oppose these recommendations to prevent them from being included in the upcoming draft Pandemic Treaty and the IHR Amendments.
There are many troubling proposed actions advanced by the Zero Draft Report. Here are five:
1) Global Surveillance (p. 13)
The Zero Draft Report advises:
WHO Secretariat to strengthen existing systems and networks for coordinated global surveillance of public health threats, based on transparency and interoperability using digital tools to connect information centers around the world and to include animal and environmental health surveillance, with appropriate protections of people’s rights.
What would this “coordinated global surveillance . . . using digital tools . . .” look like? How will this surveillance system be implemented? No doubt through Vaccine Passports, Smart Health Cards, or other forms of digital IDs.
If not effectively opposed now, the digital health ID is the way that China’s Social Credit System will likely be implemented internationally. Once the infrastructure is in place, there will be no dissent, because if you post a dissenting opinion online, you can be cancelled off of social media, or worse, be severed from your credit cards or bank accounts.
The Chinese Communist Party uses digital health codes to stamp out dissent. For example, hundreds of people in China recently had their bank accounts frozen, with no explanation, devastating the individuals and the businesses affected. Depositors were going to travel to Shanghai to protest. Suddenly, they found that their digital health codes had switched from green to red, preventing them from traveling and stopping the protest.
Do you think such a thing could never happen in a democracy? It already has. We saw this happen in Canada with the truckers and some of their supporters, just this past February. The Emergencies Act was invoked, under which banks froze the assets and credit cards of truckers and those who had donated to their cause through crowdfunding platforms.
Note also that the “global surveillance” system is not reserved for viral pandemics, but for unspecified “public health threats . . . to include animal and environmental surveillance.” Given the “One Health Approach” discussed below, a “public health threat” could mean anything, including but not limited to depression, gun violence, racism, and climate change.
The words, “transparency and interoperability,” appear to mean that everyone in society will be transparent to the WHO’s “information centers around the world,” with all our data uploaded into an interoperable global system. This data sharing in the name of international travel could supply our private information to bad actors, such as the Chinese Communist Party.
2) Censorship of Dissenting Views (Paragraph 12(i) [sic], page 6)
This provision recommends that the WHO should have the power to address “misinformation and disinformation in respect of pandemic PPR (preparedness and response).” If this proposal is accepted, the WHO could institute a global “Ministry of Truth” — similar to the Biden administration’s proposed Disinformation Governance Board — to censor and silence doctors, scientists, activists, the press, and anyone else who disagrees with the official WHO narrative.
3) “One Health Approach” (Paragraph 12(h), page 6)
This provision proposes:
Implementation of a One Health approach related to prevention and surveillance, including specific responsibilities and a clear division of labour among the partners in the quadripartite alliance . . .
What is “One Health”? According to the CDC:
One Health is a collaborative, multisectoral, and transdisciplinary approach—working at the local, regional, national, and global levels—with the goal of achieving optimal health outcomes recognizing the interconnection between people, animals, plants, and their shared environment.
This language sounds benign but is potentially catastrophic for freedom. By this definition, local health concerns deemed a “public health threat” can be controlled at the global level, giving the WHO the right to intervene anywhere at any time – destroying national sovereignty.
What is the “quadripartite alliance”?
On April 29, 2022, the WHO website posted an announcement: Quadripartite Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed for a new era of One Health Collaboration. It states:
The four international agencies, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Health Organization (WHO), have signed a groundbreaking agreement to strengthen cooperation to sustainably balance and optimize the health of humans, animals, plants and the environment. (Spelling in original.)
One Health, therefore, includes not only human health, but also the health of animals, agricultural plants and the environment. If passed, the WHO would have control over every aspect of existence on earth. The WHO would not necessarily prioritize human health, but rather would “balance” human health with animal and plant health, as well as environmental health such as climate change. The quadripartite alliance provides the “legal and formal framework” to accomplish this.
4) Powers of Enforcement: Accountability (Table 8, page 19)
Currently, the WHO has little power of enforcement. The Zero Draft Report proposes to change that. This section recommends that the International Health Regulations be strengthened:
WHO secretariat to consult and update MS [Member States] and relevant stakeholders on the pilot UHPR [Universal Health and Preparedness Review], to assess, report on and improve compliance with IHR requirements, and to ensure accountability for the IHR obligations, through a multisectoral and whole-of-government approach.
How can the WHO “improve compliance” and “ensure accountability”? The enforcement mechanism is not specified in the Zero Draft Report. Would this “multisectoral and whole-of-government” approach (discussed below) include a WHO military or police force, or perhaps require nations to sanction a non-compliant member state? If combined with a digital currency, the WHO could cut non-compliant individuals or whole nations off from any ability to access their bank accounts or transact business, effectively paralyzing them.
5) “Whole of Government and Whole of Society Approach” (Paragraph 16, page 8)
This paragraph states that a “whole of government and whole of society approach for pandemic PPR [pandemic preparedness and response] is required.” These terms are not clearly defined. They sound wholesome and holistic, but are actually toxic to freedom: any aspect of government or society could be brought to serve the WHO’s chosen response to a “public health threat,” possibly including CCP-style lockdowns, quarantines and forced vaccinations. Does the WHO envision commandeering the media, education, transportation – possibly even banking and the military?
I have already written about how the proposed Biden Amendments to the International Health Regulations would transform the WHO into a tool of mass surveillance and totalitarian control. These Amendments are still under consideration by a new working group at the WHO.
The Zero Draft Report is consistent with the proposed Biden Amendments, and I expect the upcoming draft Pandemic Treaty to be cut of the same cloth. We need vigilantly and vehemently to oppose the imposition of a biomedical, digital gulag through the WHO, under the pretext of protecting our health.
It should be our first priority to defeat these attacks on our personal and national sovereignty. We need to inform our representatives to oppose these measures, and question all candidates for national or state office about their views on the threat the unelected bureaucrats at the WHO may pose to our national sovereignty and constitutional rights.
Watch Reggie’s interview of Dr. Peter Breggin HERE.
I recently had the privilege of interviewing one of my great heroes, Dr. Peter Breggin. He is one of the bravest and most brilliant people I know. Dr. Breggin and his wife, Ginger, co-authored the book,Covid-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey. It is a harrowing but highly informative and well documented read.
According to Dr. Breggin himself, this was a unique interview. I begin the interview by asking him about his days as a college student at Harvard, when he volunteered in a psychiatric facility and discovered to his horror the use of lobotomies and electroshock treatment to subdue patients. From there, he tells the story of his life, including his battles with Big Pharma. He shows how his entire life has prepared him for this moment and for his mission: to expose and oppose the Chinese communist / globalist agenda under the disguise of Covid healthcare. In the end, he speaks passionately of his love for America and our unique place in history, a great message for Independence Day.
Hear the inspiring life story of this surpassingly brave man. Watch my extended interview of Dr. Peter Breggin HERE.
Chinese Widow “Lixue” (name changed to protect her identity) Lost her Husband, her Son, and her Will to Live
International Women’s Day is celebrated this week. We are the only organization with a “Save a Widow” campaign that is saving abandoned and destitute widows in China. Watch a short video HERE.
Lixue is seventy-four years old. Her husband passed away 30 years ago from lung cancer. Tragically, her only child, a son, committed suicide in June 2020, at age 26, just one month before our fieldworker found her. Lixue said she was “too sad to live.” We may have saved this precious widow from committing suicide, like her son.
Then, just last month, Lixue fainted in her front yard, right when our fieldworker was visiting her! Our fieldworker moved Lixue out of the heat, with the help of neighbors, and stayed with her as she recovered, perhaps from heat stroke. If our fieldworker had not been there, anything could have happened. Lixue thanked our fieldworker for saving her life – perhaps for a second time!
Lixue has never been to school and she has never traveled outside the town in rural China where she was born. She was infertile, and so adopted her son when she was forty-six years old. (His biological mother ran away when he was one month old.) Since Lixue is from a poor family, no one wanted to marry her son. (Because of the sex-selective abortion of baby girls, there is now a great shortage of marriage-age women. For this reason, a young man’s parents are often expected to provide a home for their son so that he can attract a wife.) Lixue believes her son killed himself because he borrowed money to attract a girlfriend, and could not pay it back. Lixue can’t forgive herself, because she had no money to help him.
When our fieldworker first found her, Lixue said she was “too sad to live.” Was Lixue thinking of committing suicide? If so, she would not be alone. China has the highest female suicide rate of any country in the world, especially in the rural areas. Beyond this, senior suicide has skyrocketed over the past 25 years, because the One Child Policy has decimated the family structure and left millions of seniors destitute with no children to care for them.
Our fieldworkers in China are committed Christians who delight in sharing their faith, at great risk to themselves because of religious persecution by the Chinese Communist Party. Lixue says that her neighbors ignore her because her life is so miserable. They regard her as a symbol of being unlucky. But she says that we love her and support her, without asking her for anything in return. She has begun to attend the Christian fellowship in her village, where for the first time she has friends!
We give all the widows an extra $10 at Christmas for a gift. Lixue said that receiving a Christmas gift was beyond her imagination. Instead of buying extra food or heating her room with the money, she decided to spend the entire $10 on snacks for her church at Christmas. She said, “God blessed me for Christmas, so I will give the blessing back to the church members.” The monthly support and uplifting visits of our fieldworker have transformed her life. She says that now, she has hope and peace in her life because she accepts Jesus Christ and she is a new person.
Our fieldworker came to Lixue saying she is a human being deserving of dignity and love. She also offered Lixue $25 per month in practical support. Lixue feels comforted, knowing that there are people in the world who care about her enough to visit her every month and give her the financial help she desperately needs to rescue her from abject poverty.
Women’s Rights Without Frontiers is helping Lixue during her time of greatest need, giving her hope and practical help. With our help, she knows she is loved. With the $25 a month we give her, she is able to eat better and heat her little room in the cold winter.
In commemoration of International Widow’s Day, will you help abandoned widows in China?
The globalists at Davos and the World Health Organization continue to build out the Digital Gulag of the Great Reset. In meetings hosted in Geneva in late May, it was revealed that the WHO has contracted with Deutsche Telecom and its subsidiary, T-Systems, for the development of a global vaccine passport platform. And, at Davos, the World Economic Forum showcased plans for a global carbon footprint tracker. Both tools are gateways to mass surveillance and social credit systems modeled on Communist China’s brutal and draconian system of population control.
Meanwhile, Reggie analyzes the WHO’s “Zero Draft” and how it could be used to take away our freedom. This “Zero Draft” is likely to influence the developing “Pandemic Treaty.” Taken together, the proposed Biden Amendments and the Zero Draft Report would set up a global infrastructure of surveillance and control that would depend on the chronic finding of pandemics and other health events in order to justify its existence. Not only that, but under the guise of protecting our health, this infrastructure could be used to identify and silence dissenters, like it is used in the Chinese Social Credit System. It should be our first priority to defeat these attacks on our personal and national sovereignty.
Reggie’s introduction and remarks can be found at 5:50 to 15:42, but the entire Webinar is well worth watching.