Please watch this in-depth interview about the dangers we face from new agreements coming out of the World Health Organization and the United Nations. Our freedom and sovereignty hang in the balance. Listen to this interview on Debbie Georgatos’ show, “America Can We Talk,” to learn why.
Please watch this powerful, in-depth interview with Mel K on “Exposing Global Governance and Total Control.” Together, we take a deep dive into the UN’s imminent power grab through the “Summit on the Future,” as well as the global push for digital IDs and how these can lead to a Social Credit System similar to that of China. We delve into the forces that undermine democracy and the need for everyone to take action to preserve our national sovereignty and constitutional rights.
Frank Gaffney recently interviewed me concerning our Sovereignty Summit 2.0. We discussed a remark made by Nigel Farage, to the effect that the United Nations from the beginning was established to undermine the Nation State. That would explain a lot.
We also discussed the Digital Gulag, a trap set by the combination of Digital IDs, surveillance, censorship, and Central Bank Digital Currencies. Technology for all of these is highly advanced and spreading quickly. In my opinion, the trap is already set by the global elites. They just need a crisis to snap it shut. Will that crisis be monkeypox or avian flu?
Watch this quick, 10-minute interview on Epoch Times TV program, America’s Hope with Kelly Wright. We discuss concerns that recent actions taken by Health and Human Services and the American Medical Association are paving the way for the FDA to issue an Emergency Use Authorization for Avian Flu injections, similar to what happened at the beginning of Covid. Meanwhile, the WHO and the European Union are rolling out Digital IDs worldwide. These are tools of mass surveillance and totalitarian control that can be used to trap us in a “digital gulag” unless we resist.
Here are some troubling recent developments. U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra recently determined that “there is a significant potential for a public health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national security or the health and security of United States citizens living abroad . . .” This declaration clears the way for the Commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to issue Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) for Avian Flu vaccines with no liability for the manufacturers.
In anticipation that such EUAs will be forthcoming, the American Medical Association published on July 19 a CPT code that will allow doctors to be reimbursed for administering Bird Flu vaccines. Might these measures be followed by mandates for those “jabs” and possibly for masks, social distancing and lockdowns, as well – as was the case for Covid-19?
Will the World Health Organization’s Director General, Tedros Ghebreyesus, declare Avian Flu to be “a public health emergency of international concern”? Such a determination would enable him to bring to bear powers conferred on him by the recently adopted agreement amending the WHO’s International Health Regulations. He may also seize this pretext for hastily completing a sweeping new and even more problematic Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response Treaty.
As many of you know, I have been voicing concern for years that a pandemic – actual or pretextual — would be declared just before the U.S. election in November. I hope I am wrong in worrying that this potential pandemic will be used as a pretext to lock us down, shut down polls and force mail-in ballots, which can easily be tampered with. Beyond this, the WHO’s newly amended International Health Regulations require nations, including the United States, to surveil their citizens and address “misinformation and disinformation.” Will all dissenting views be censored, including those of medical doctors who believe treatment other than experimental MRNA gene therapies will be more effective against the bird flu? Will the WHO and CDC exaggerate the seriousness of the bird flu as well as the safety and effectiveness of so-called vaccines in order to pressure people into taking a jab? Will the US government and governments worldwide require digital health IDs, which can be used as instruments of mass surveillance and totalitarian control, similar to China’s Social Credit System? I believe we are on the verge of losing our freedom. The time to resist is now!
Globalists intent on using these public health-related accords to promote what they call “global governance” will surely justify similar surrenders of national sovereignty and individual freedoms to the UN Secretary General at the upcoming “Summit of the Future” in September.
All of these prospects will be the subject of informed scrutiny and, if possible, agreement on concerted joint action during the Sovereignty Coalition’s Second Sovereignty Summit to be held virtually from 9:00-11:00 a.m. on Monday, July 29th. Participants will include: U.S. Congressmen Ralph Norman and Bob Good; parliamentarians in the European Parliament and national legislatures, notably, UK Member of Parliament Nigel Farage, Italian Senator and former EU MP Stasys Jakeliunas; front-line medical doctors such as Drs. Peter McCullough, David Bell,Kat Lindley andMeryl Nass; constitutional and other attorneys like Mat Staver, Philipp Kruse (from Switzerland)and Reggie Littlejohn; American and foreign public policy advocates like Kris Ullman and Stefano Gennarini. Frank Gaffney, co-chair of the Sovereignty Coalition, will moderate.
I traveled to Geneva, Switzerland to be present while the World Health Organization was meeting between May 27 and June 1 of this year. During this time, I participated in an historic International Lawyers Press Conference of ten attorneys from nine countries, all speaking to different aspects of the totalitarian global governance scheme advanced by the WHO in its newly amended International Health Regulations and the proposed Pandemic Treaty. I focused my remarks on what I call the Digital Gulag currently being created by international, interoperable Digital IDs. These will be used to track and control virtually every aspect of our lives and are currently being rolled out by the World Health Organization, in collaboration with the European Union.
You can watch the entire press conference HERE. (2 hours, 38 minutes, beginning at 27:00)
It is interesting to note that at the time of this press conference – the morning of June 1, 2024 — we had understood that neither the Pandemic Treaty nor the Amendments to the International Health Regulations would be voted on at the World Health Assembly. Yet at 9:00 that night, the WHA submitted the Amendments to a vote and passed them — this, despite the fact that the final text was required to be circulated at least four months in advance of a vote. The final text was instead circulated just a few hours in advance of the vote, rendering the vote invalid.
Thanks to Catherine Austin Fitts of Solari for recognizing our work on exposing the WHO. This is a great encouragement to me and an honor to be included in Solari’s gallery of heroes – the “Anti-WHO Crew.”
Check out the screenshots from the Solari Report below:
Catherine herself is a hero. Follow her Solari Report on Twitter/X @solari_the.
If anyone understands the trap that has been laid for our country, our sovereignty, our freedom and our future, it’s Mel K. We met at a rally in front of the United Nations in New York, protesting the WHO power grab. She is a fantastic interviewer and this is one of my favorite interviews on the existential dangers we face at the hands of the WHO, the UN and globalism wherever it rears its ugly head.
I recently returned from Geneva, where the World Health Assembly met from May 27 to June 1. More on this in future newsletters.
The World Health Assembly just passed Amendments to the International Health Regulations. The Amendments themselves and the manner in which they were passed are both highly problematic, even alarming. You can read my concerns here:
The fact that the WHO has passed the Amendments to the International Health Regulations is appalling on several fronts.
The manner in which these were passed flagrantly violates the WHO’s own rules. Under Article 55 of the International Health Regulations, “The text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.” That deadline passed on January 27, 2024.
In defiance of this requirement, the WHO negotiated the draft Amendments until the last minute, releasing the final text just hours before the final vote.
This violation prevented governments and civil society from being able to analyze this document and discern its implications.
The WHO’s tossing out of its own rule indicates its disregard for the rule of law. If it is willing to disregard such an important safeguard as Article 55, what is stopping it from disregarding any other provision in the IHRs? If it is willing to ignore its own laws, why would we expect it to honor ours?
For this reason, The Amendments to the IHR are invalid and should be rejected.
Further, the Amendments that passed on June 2 retain troubling language regarding censorship. These provisions have been buried in Annex 1,A.2.c., which requires State Parties to “develop, strengthen and maintain core capacities . . . in relation to… surveillance . . . and risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation.”
The requirement that nations “address” “misinformation and disinformation” is fraught with opportunities for abuse. None of these terms is defined in the document. Does “addressing” it mean censoring it, and possibly punishing those who have offered divergent opinions? We have already seen how doctors and scientists who disagreed with the WHO narrative under Covid 19 were censored for their views – views that turned out to be true. Some who offered protocols not recommended by the WHO even had their licenses to practice medicine threatened or suspended. How much worse will this censorship be if it is baked in as a requirement to the International Health Regulations?
The “surveillance” requirement does not specify what is to be surveilled. The IHR amendments, however, should be read together with the proposed Pandemic Treaty, which the WHO is continuing to negotiate. Article 5 of the most recent draft of the Treaty sets forth the “One Health Approach,” which connects and balances human, animal, plant and environmental health, giving a pretext for surveillance on all these fronts.
Meanwhile, Article 4: Pandemic Prevention and Public Health Surveillance, states:
2 bis. The Parties recognize that environmental, climatic, social, anthropogenic [climate change caused by people], and economic factors increase the risk of pandemics and endeavor to identify these factors and take them into consideration in the development and implementation of relevant policies . . .”
Through the “One Health” approach, the WHO is asserting its authority over all aspects of life on earth, all of which will be surveilled.
Regarding the IHR, Article 35 details the requirements of “Health Documents,” including those in digital format. The system of digital health documents is consistent with, and in my opinion a precursor to, the Digital IDs described by the World Economic Forum. According to the attached WEF Chart, people will need a Digital ID to:
Access healthcare insurance and treatment
Open bank accounts and carry out online transactions
Travel
Access Humanitarian Services
Shop and conduct business transactions
Participate in social media
Pay taxes, vote, collect government benefits
Own a communication device [such as a cell phone or a computer
In other words, individuals will need Digital IDs to access almost every aspect of civilized society. All of our actions, taken with the use of Digital IDs, will be tracked and traced. If we step out of line, we can be punished by, for example, being severed from our bank accounts and credit cards – similar to what happened to the Canadian Truckers. Digital IDs are a form of mass surveillance and totalitarian control.
These Digital IDs are currently being rolled out by the World Health Organization in collaboration with the European Union.
It is concerning that the IHR Amendments mention “pandemic emergency” 16 times. “Pandemic emergency” is a euphemism for a potential pandemic. See Article 1, Definitions. The Amendments to the IHR expand the WHO’s authority beyond actual pandemics to potential pandemics – as decided by the Director General.
It is also troubling that the words, “prepare” or “preparedness” are used nine additional times in the Amended IHRs as compared with the 2005 IHRs. This repeated emphasis on preparedness expands the authority of the WHO from response during a pandemic to times between pandemics. Since nations must always be in a state of preparedness, the WHO will be exercising its expanded authority in perpetuity.
The IHR Amendments, taken together with the impending Pandemic Treaty, will usher in a global, totalitarian bio-tech surveillance police state. Their adoption just hours after their disclosure is invalid and must be rejected.
On Friday, May 24 – just three days before the World Health Assembly — the WHO announced that the working group tasked with creating a final draft of the Pandemic Treaty was unable to come to a consensus. Same with the Amendments to the International Health Regulations. In other words, their negotiations fell apart, and they were unable to meet their deadline.
Is this cause for celebration? YES. As co-founder of the Sovereignty Coalition, I and others have been advocating passionately for months that the vote on these treaties must be delayed. It is a violation of the WHO’s own regulations to present amendments so close to the voting date.
Worldwide advocacy played a powerful role in this turn of events. To everyone who took action on one of the Sovereignty Coalition’s many campaigns, this victory belongs to you!!!
We cannot, however, rest on our laurels. These scheming globalists absolutely will not give up. See what Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus – Director General of the World Health Organization — said about the failure to reach consensus:
“This is not a failure. We will try everything – believing that anything is possible – and make this happen because the world still needs a pandemic treaty.”
They will “try everything” to “make this [Treaty] happen.” The globalists could try anything, including floating an entirely new document at the World Health Assembly – a document that could be worse than the Treaty itself. They could pass that as a compromise measure and destroy our freedoms that way. For this reason, I just arrived in Geneva, Switzerland, today to be able to report from the ground on the shenanigans that will no doubt take place at the World Health Assembly.Rest assured, the Pandemic Treaty and the Amendments to the International Health Regulations are not dead and gone. They are merely delayed. This delay in itself is a victory. It enables us to reach out and educate the world about the dangers of these two treaties. It gives us a fighting chance actually to defeat this diabolical plan.