Littlejohn to United Nations: Forced Abortion Is Not the Answer to Climate Change

Reggie Littlejohn at the United Nations

Reggie Littlejohn at the United Nations

The theme for UNCSW 2016 is “Women’s empowerment and the link to sustainable development.” Regarding “sustainable development,” at the U.N. Climate Conference in Copenhagen in December of 2009, a senior official responsible for the coercive population control famously stated that the One Child Policy was successful in reducing carbon emissions blamed for global warming.

According to Xinhua, Zhao Baige, then-Vice Minister of China’s National Population and Family Planning Commission, stated:

“China has managed to bring down its birth rate with the family planning policy in the past 30 years, which results in less population and less carbon dioxide emission . . . Such a decline in population growth converts into a reduction of 1.83 billion tons of carbon dioxide emission in China per annum at present. . . . The policy on family planning proves to be a great success. It not only contributes to reduction of global emission, but also provides experiences for other countries, developing countries in particular, in their pursuit for a coordinated and sustainable development.”

China’s Population Policy Helps Slow Global Warming, Says Official 12/10/09 (Copenhagen) http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-12/10/content_12624315.htm

China has touted the elimination of 400 million lives under the coercive One Child Policy as an effective means to combat climate change. They have also set their population control program out as a successful example for developing nations to follow.

What the Chinese government has not mentioned is the fact that too many of these lives were prevented through forced abortion and involuntary sterilization.

Human beings are not walking carbon footprints.

Forced abortion is not a choice. It is official government rape.

To understand the brutal truth behind forced abortion in China, watch:

Stop Forced Abortion – China’s War on Women! Video (4 mins)
http://www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/?nav=stop-forced-abortion

In the United States, we’ve had about 55 million abortions since the Roe v. Wade decision. In China 400 million lives have been “prevented.” That is a greater number than the entire population of the United States and Canada combined. In the United States, we have approximately 1 million abortions a year. The Chinese government has reported 13 million abortions a year. That figure works out to more than 35,000 abortions every day, or more than 1450 per hour.

These atrocities continue to this day. China’s new Two-Child Policy will not end forced abortion, forced sterilization or other forms of coercion. Unmarried women and third children will still be forcibly aborted.

The only way to end forced abortion under the One Child Policy is to end coercive population control entirely.

The UNCSW this year is reviewing the 2013 theme, “the prevention of violence against women and girls.” Forced abortion and gendercide under China’s One Child Policy will continue under the two-child policy. Since the UNCSW has stated through its 2013 “Agreed Conclusions” that coercive population control should end, WRWF calls upon the U.N. to take effective action to end it.

More often than not, gendercide is not a choice either. There is a strong correlation between sex-selective abortion and coercion. Crushing social, economic, political and personal pressures in cultures with a strong son preference trample women pregnant with girls. All too often, women in these cultures do not “select” their daughters for abortion. They are forced.

For most of us, “it’s a girl” is cause for enormous joy, happiness and celebration. But in many countries, this phrase can be a death sentence. In fact, the words, “it’s a girl” are the deadliest words on earth when said at the birth of a child. According to one U.N. estimate, up to 200 million women are missing in the world today due to “gendercide,” the selective abortion, abandonment or deadly neglect of baby girls just because they are female.

This is not a political issue. This is a human rights issue that must be approached as an area of common ground. No one supports the systematic elimination of women and girls.

In China, the birth ratio of girls to boys is the most skewed in the world. The sex ratio at birth has risen from 108.5 in 1982 to almost 118 boys born for every 100 girls born in 2010.

Sons traditionally carry on the family name, work the fields, and take care of their parents in old age. A daughter joins her husband’s family at marriage. There is a saying: “Raising a girl is like watering someone else’s garden.” The One Child Policy exacerbates the underlying son preference. When couples are restricted to one child, women often become the focus of intense pressure by their husband and in-laws to ensure a boy.

A woman need not be dragged out of her home and strapped down to a table to be a victim of forced abortion. Persistent emotional pressure, estrangement from the extended family, threat of abandonment or divorce, verbal abuse, and domestic violence often overpower women who otherwise would choose to keep their daughters.

Systematic, sex-selective abortion constitutes gendercide. Because of this gendercide, there are an estimated 37 million more males than females in China today. The presence of these “excess males” is the driving force behind human trafficking and sexual slavery, not only within China but from surrounding nations as well.

China has the highest female suicide rate of any country in the world. According to the 2013 U.S. State Department China Human Rights Report, the numbers of female suicides have risen sharply in the past several years, from 500 women per day to 590.

China’s One Child Policy causes more violence against women and girls than any other official policy on earth and any other official policy in the history of the world. This is the true “War Against Women.”

The One Child Policy is causing a “senior tsunami.” The population is aging rapidly, with no young population to sustain it. According to figures provided by political economist and demographer Nicholas Eberstadt, China’s working population peaked in 2013 at about 73% and is now beginning a steady decline to 67% in 2030. Meanwhile, the ratio of China’s population, ages 55-64 to its population ages 15 to 24, will increase from about 30% in 1990 to 140% in 2030.

Bottom line: China will grow old before it grows rich. China’s population problem is not that it has too many people, but that it has too few young people.

Finally, a medical study from China has revealed an additional way in which women are victimized by the One-Child Policy: significantly increased risk of breast cancer.

A meta-analysis of the association between induced abortion and breast cancer risk among Chinese females, dated November 24, 2013, was published by NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information, branch of the NIH, National Institute of Health.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24272196

Researchers in China have found that the dramatic rise in breast cancer in China is associated with the prevalence of induced abortions (IA) under the One-Child Policy. The study, conducted by a team of epidemiologists from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital, analyzed data from over 36 different studies in both the United States and China. Their conclusion:“IA [is] significantly associated with an increased risk of breast cancer among Chinese females, and the risk of breast cancer increases as the number of IA increases.” Specifically, the study found that one IA increases a woman’s risk of breast cancer by 44 percent, two by 76 percent, and three by 89 percent.

The study notes that historically, China has had low breast cancer rates when compared with Western nations, but “the incidence of breast cancer in China ha[s] increased at an alarming rate over the past two decades.” The study notes that this rise “was paralleled to the one-child-per-family policy.”
In our view, the strong association of abortion and breast cancer established by this study brings the women’s rights violations under the One Child Policy to a new level: a woman pregnant in China without a birth permit is subjected to both government imposed forced abortion, and also breast cancer as a result of it. Where abortion is forced, the subsequent development of breast cancer becomes a violation of women’s rights in itself. “China: One-Child Policy Linked to Breast Cancer – Study.” http://www.womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/blog/?p=1428. 12/2/13

It is a woman’s right to choose to give birth to her daughters. Together, China and India comprise one third of the world’s population. That one-third of the world’s women are deprived of their right to bear girls is the biggest women’s rights abuse on earth. This is the true War on Women, and it deserves a passionate response from groups that stand for women’s rights.

These problems are not confined to China and India. Female feticide happens in the United States and Canada in numbers significant enough to distort gender ratios. This is discrimination against women in its most violent form.

Fortunately, there is hope. Women’s Rights Without Frontiers has launched two campaigns. First is our international advocacy campaign, in which we document these atrocities and speak to governments about how we in the West are funding it through UNFPA and International Planned Parenthood. We have had some success: The European Parliament passed a Resolution and the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women in 2013 passed an “Agreed Conclusion” condemning forced abortion and state-run coercive population control.

Second, through our “Save a Girl” Campaign in rural China, we are stopping gendercide, one baby girl at a time. We have field workers in China who reach out to women who have had an ultrasound, learned that they are pregnant with a girl, and are planning to abort or abandon her. A field worker will visit that woman and say, “Don’t abort your baby just because she’s a girl. She’s a precious daughter. We will give you a monthly stipend for a year, to help you support her.”

The practical support we offer empowers these women to keep their daughters. By the time the girl is three months old, she’s laughing and smiling and the whole family is in love with her. They can’t imagine life without her and thank us for saving the life of their daughter. This is what gets me out of bed in the morning – knowing that there are babies in China who are alive today because of our efforts. It is astonishing how little money it takes to save someone’s life in China.

We are also living the mission every day, around our own kitchen table. With the help of Cong. Chris Smith and other brave souls in the United States and China, we were able to obtain safe passage from China to the United States for Anni and Ruli Zhang, the daughters of veteran pro-democracy activist Zhang Lin, who is currently serving a 3.5 year jail sentence for standing up for 10-year-old Anni’s right to go to school. My husband Robert and I have taken Anni and Ruli into our family and are raising them as our own daughters. Anni has won a piano competition and will play at Carnegie Hall in December!
Every struggling mother in China and India deserves help to keep her daughter. Every little girl deserves to see the light of day.

If you want to join us in this struggle, I would welcome your help. This is beyond David and Goliath. It’s an enormous, long-term battle, but together, we can end forced abortion and gendercide and sweep these atrocities into the dung-heap of history, where they belong.

Learn more about the “Save a Girl” campaign:
http://womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/index.php?nav=end-gendercide-and-forced-abortion

Posted in China's One Child Policy, Chinese Communist Party, coerced abortion, female suicide, forced sterilization, gendercide, human trafficking, One Child Policy, pro-choice, pro-life, rape, reproductive health, reproductive rights, right to choose, Save a Girl, sex selective abortion, suicide, two child policy, Uncategorized, UNCSW, United Nations, war on women, Women's Rights Without Frontiers | Comments Off on Littlejohn to United Nations: Forced Abortion Is Not the Answer to Climate Change

International Women’s Day — Stop Sex-Selective Abortion! NIPT in the Bud: Boost in Prenatal DNA Testing Could Target Girls for Sex-Selective Abortion

Following the Chinese government’s misleading announcement that it will “abandon” its One Child Policy, women’s rights in China are in more danger than ever before – especially for baby girls.

NIPT, a prenatal diagnostic technology, analyzes fetal DNA taken from a mother’s blood to discover birth defects. However, the tool can also be used to discover a baby’s gender as early as seven weeks’ gestation – making it easier to terminate the pregnancy if it is unwanted for being female.

Such abuse has been documented in several countries, including the United States and Great Britain, where a government study recently suggested the test might be linked to prenatal gendercide.

Market watchers now predict that NIPT is set for rapid growth under the new Two-Child Policy in China, where baby girls already struggle to survive under a strong cultural preference for males.

“Where brutal son preference meets non-invasive, early sex determination of a fetus, inevitably baby girls will be selectively aborted,” said Women’s Rights Without Frontiers President Reggie Littlejohn in testimony before the U.S. Congressional-Executive Commission on China earlier this month.  “Because of its convenience as a simple blood test and its ability to determine gender very early in a pregnancy, NIPT will place second daughters at even higher risk, likely resulting in a rise in sex-selective abortions.”

The demand for NIPT has already grown so strong that Chinese officials last year implemented stricter regulations for its use – apparently with an eye to curbing abuses by expectant families. The restriction was reportedly lifted a few months later.

Sex selective abortions, according to a 2009 British Medical Journal study, account for almost all the excess males in China:  in other words, 37 million Chinese men will never marry because their future wives were aborted. This provides a strong demand for trafficking in women and sexual slavery in and around China.

This is the latest example demonstrating that the Chinese Communist Party’s switch to a Two Child Policy will not end human rights abuses.  China’s forced population control system remains in place, as do the conditions giving rise to gendercide.  Littlejohn continued, “We have saved nearly 200 at-risk baby girls from sex-selective abortion or abandonment.  The rise of the NIPT technology makes our ‘Save a Girl’ Campaign all the more urgent.”

Click here to learn more about WRWF’s Save a Girl Campaign.

Click here to sign our petition to the Chinese embassy against forced population control.

Click here to watch a video on forced abortions in China.

Related Links:

Two-Child Policy Expected to Further Boost China’s Growing NIPT Market

http://www.gosreports.com/two-child-policy-expected-to-further-boost-chinas-growing-nipt-market/

Experts worried pre-natal blood test might lead to sex-selective abortions

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/11980660/Experts-worried-pre-natal-blood-test-might-lead-to-sex-selective-abortions.html

Global Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) Market is Expected to Grow at 17.6% CAGR During 2015 – 2020

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/global-non-invasive-prenatal-testing-nipt-market-is-expected-to-grow-at-176-cagr-during-2015—2020-2015-11-19-82033153

China Cracks Down on DNA Testing

http://www.forbes.com/sites/shuchingjeanchen/2014/03/03/china-cracks-down-on-dna-testing-2/

China lifts ban on prenatal genetic testing

https://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/07/10/china-lifts-ban-on-prenatal-genetic-testing/

China approves DNA sequencing devices to detect genetic defects in babies

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1545648/china-approves-dna-sequencing-devices-detect-babies-birth-defects

Posted in China's One Child Policy, gendercide, International Women's Day, NIPT, One Child Policy, pro-choice, pro-life, Save a Girl, sex selective abortion, two child policy, Uncategorized | Comments Off on International Women’s Day — Stop Sex-Selective Abortion! NIPT in the Bud: Boost in Prenatal DNA Testing Could Target Girls for Sex-Selective Abortion

WRWF’s Reggie Littlejohn to Testify at the U.S. Congress Thursday

Reggie Littlejohn testifies at the United States Congress, concerning China's One Child Policy

Reggie Littlejohn testifies at the United States Congress, concerning China’s One Child Policy

WRWF’s Reggie Littlejohn will testify at a hearing entitled, “China’s New ‘Two-Child Policy’ & the Continuation of Massive Crimes Against Women and Children.”  The hearing will take place on Thursday, December 3 from10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. at the Capitol Hill Visitor’s Center, Room HVC 210.  The hearing is open to the public, so please feel free to attend.

The hearing will be chaired by Congressman Chris Smith and Senator Marco Rubio.  Also testifying will be demographer Nicholas Eberstadt and activist Jennifer Li.

Posted in China's One Child Policy, Chris Smith, coerced abortion, communism, Forced Abortion, forced sterilization, gendercide, Reggie Littlejohn, reproductive health, reproductive rights, Save a Girl, Uncategorized, Women's Rights Without Frontiers | Comments Off on WRWF’s Reggie Littlejohn to Testify at the U.S. Congress Thursday

China’s Two-Child Policy, New Number – Same Violence Against Women

Testimony of Reggie Littlejohn, President

Women’s Rights Without Frontiers

December 3, 2015

Congressional-Executive Commission on China

Honorable members of the Commission, Representative Chris Smith, Senator Marco Rubio, distinguished fellow panelists, ladies and gentlemen, I am grateful for this opportunity to testify here today, as we discuss the fact that China’s new Two-Child Policy continues the same massive crimes against women and children that were committed under the One Child Policy.

Xinhua News Agency reported on October 29, 2015 that China will move to a two-child policy for all couples, “abandoning its decades-long one-child policy.”

Characterizing this latest modification as “abandoning” the One-Child Policy is misleading. A two-child policy will not end any of the human rights abuses caused by the One Child Policy, including forced abortion, involuntary sterilization or the sex-selective abortion of baby girls.

Coercion is the core of the policy. Instituting a two-child policy will not end forced abortion or forced sterilization. As blind activist Chen Guangcheng succinctly tweeted:

This is nothing to be happy about. First the #CCP would kill any baby after one. Now they will kill any baby after two. #ChinaOneChildPolicy

The reason given for this adjustment is entirely demographic: “to balance population development and address the challenge of an ageing population.” The adjustment is a tacit admission that continuation of the one-child policy will lead to economic and demographic disaster. The policy was originally instituted for economic reasons. It is ironic that through this very policy, China has written its own economic death sentence.

Noticeably absent from the Chinese Communist party’s announcement is any mention of human rights. The Chinese Communist Party has not suddenly developed a conscience or grown a heart. Even though it will now allow all couples to have a second child, China has not promised to end forced abortion, forced sterilization, or forced contraception (1).

Indeed, the CCP has gone out of its way to emphasize that family planning restrictions will remain in force. Shortly after the announcement of the two-child policy, ViceMinister of the National Health and Family Planning Commission Wang Peian said that “China would not abandon its family planning restrictions.” He said, “A large population is China’s basic national condition so we must adhere to the basic state policy of family planning” (2). He also said that “China needs to . . . promote birth monitoring” before the two-child policy comes into effect (3).

It appears, therefore, that China plans to maintain its iron grip over the wombs of women. The Chinese Communist Party will continue to intrude into the bedrooms and between the sheets of the families in China, requiring an arduous process to obtain a “birth permit,” a system of paid informants, and ultrasound checks to make sure that a woman’s IUD is still in place (4).

Coercion is the core of the policy. Instituting a two-child policy will not end forced abortion or forced sterilization.

The problem with the one-child policy is not the number of children “allowed.” Rather, it is the fact that the CCP is telling women how many children they can have and then enforcing that limit through forced abortion and forced sterilization. There is no guarantee that the CCP will cease their appalling methods of enforcement. Women will still have to obtain a government-issued birth permit, for the first and second child, or they may be subject to forced abortion. It will still be illegal for an unmarried woman to have a child. Regardless of the number of children allowed, women who get pregnant without permission will still be dragged out of their homes, strapped down to tables, and forced to abort babies that they want.

The impact of China’s Two-Child Policy on Women in One Area of Rural China (5)

Women’s Rights Without Frontiers runs a campaign to end the sex-selective abortion of baby girls in China. Our network of fieldworkers on the ground have saved almost 200 baby girls in one area of rural China.

Through this network, WRWF gets direct, up to the minute information about coercive population control in our area of China. I communicated with the head of our network over the weekend. Here is what she said about the current condition in our villages after the announcement of the Two-Child Policy:

Forced Sterilization continues.

The women in our villages do not see the new Two-Child Policy as a big improvement, because of the threat of sterilization. It is a policy that women must be sterilized after the second child – especially if both children are girls. Women who have a boy as their first child are not likely to have a second child, because after the second child, they would be forcibly sterilized. These sterilizations ruin not only a woman’s reproductive health, but her general health as well. After these sterilizations, the vast majority of women are “never the same again.” They will never recover their strength. For example, in our villages there is no running water. Women need to pump water out of a deep well. Before they are sterilized, women are strong enough to pump water. After they are sterilized, they are no longer strong enough to pump water. This weakness lasts forever and is devastating, because the family depends on the strength of the mother to do farm work.

Especially women whose first child is a girl feel they have to hide their second pregnancy, because they will be automatically sterilized after the second child. If their second child is also a girl, they do not want to be sterilized, because the procedure may break their health and because they want to try again for a boy. Many women will abort or abandon their second daughter under the Two-Child Policy, just as they did under the One Child Policy. The second daughters who are allowed to be born will be hidden, and thus denied hukou, as in our villages, hukou is given to second children only after the mother has been sterilized. Requiring sterilization in order for your child to register and obtain a birth certificate is an atrocity against both women and children.

Forced abortion continues.

If a woman is illegally pregnant now with her second child, Family Planning Officials will come to her home to demand an abortion. The Two-Child Policy has yet to be fully implemented. Women whose child was conceived before the implementation of the Two Child Policy are still subject to forced abortion or astronomical “terror fines” (6). If a  woman wants a second child, she must first obtain a “birth permit.” These permits are not likely to become available until well into next year.

According to our network, if a woman is caught illegally pregnant and cannot pay the fine, she will still be forcibly aborted, as was the case under the One Child Policy. According to the president of a local hospital and a family planning official contacted by our network, if a woman runs away in an attempt to escape the fine, and is caught, she will be forcibly aborted. The woman will have no recourse to a court of law, as courts will not accept such cases.

In our villages, whether or not a woman is actually forced to have an abortion depends on the circumstances. Women who are poor, whose relatives do not work for the government, and who do not have any power to defend themselves are more likely to be forcibly aborted than women who have money or whose relatives work for the government. Another factor is whether the Family Planning Official handling that particular case is merciful or merciless. A pitiless Family Planning Official confronting a poor and powerless woman will often lead to a forced abortion.

Women in our villages have resorted to desperate measures to avoid forced abortion when faced with an illegal pregnancy. The following situation is common in our area:

“Ai Bao” (not her real name) is a two-month old second daughter, with a threeyear-old sister. Since this was an illegal second pregnancy, Ai Bao’s mother tried to hide her pregnancy. Still, a Family Planning Officer found her and pressed her to get abortion. Ai Bao’s mother found an un-married pregnant woman, paid that woman ¥ 2000, and arranged for this woman to use the name of Ai Bao’s mother to get an abortion. In this way, Ai Bao’s mother obtained an abortion certification from the hospital in her own name and turned it in to local Family Planning Office – to escape the forced abortion of her own daughter, Ai Bao.

Gendercide will continue.

Instituting a two-child policy will not end gendercide, the sex-selective abortion of baby girls. Indeed, areas in which two children currently are allowed are especially vulnerable to gendercide. According to the 2009 British Medical Journal study of data from the 2005 national census, in nine provinces, for “second order births” where the first child is a girl, 160 boys were born for every 100 girls. In two provinces, Jiangsu and Anhui, for the second child, there were 190 boys for every hundred girls born. This study stated, “sex selective abortion accounts for almost all the excess males.” Because of this gendercide, there are an estimated 37 million Chinese men who will never marry because their future wives were terminated before they were born. This gender imbalance is a powerful, driving force behind trafficking in women and sexual slavery, not only in China, but in neighboring nations as well.

There is little reason to hope that the two-child policy will result in a significant improvement of the sex ratios at birth. Many women whose first child is a boy may choose not to bear a second child because of the great expense of raising a child in China. In the alternative, they may choose not to have a second child to avoid the forced sterilization required after two children. Women whose first child is a girl will still abort second daughters in order to have a son.

In addition, a technology that is potentially dangerous to girls has found its way to China. It has recently been discovered that “cell free” fetal DNA can be found in the blood of the pregnant mother. Noninvasive prenatal testing, whose ominous acronym is “NIPT,” is a new way to detect chromosomal abnormalities of a fetus through analyzing the blood of the mother. This simple blood test given to the mother, however, can be used to determine the gender of a fetus as early as seven weeks into the pregnancy. Results are available within 48 hours. Where brutal son preference meets non-invasive, early sex determination of a fetus, inevitably baby girls will be selectively aborted (7).

Hukou Abuses Continue.

WRWF’s network reports that in our area, unless a woman is sterilized, her second child will be denied household registration or hukou. Without hukou, children are denied access to healthcare, education and other public benefits.

For illegal extra births, Chinese Family Planning Officials may exact enormous sums for a family to obtain hukou. Frustrated fathers have lost control and murdered family planning officials (8). Some men have resorted to suicide in protest over the excessive fines imposed by the government (9). The spirit of the Cultural Revolution lives on in the family planning police, who have been able to steal, intimidate, torture and kill with relative impunity.

There has been recent talk of registering 13 million people who do not have hukou. The motive appears to be an attempt to “make the population look less unbalanced” (10).

WRWF demands the unconditional end of the hukou system as being inhumane. Eliminating hukou by itself, however, will not end gendercide unless it is accompanied by the elimination of forced sterilization and all coercive birth limits. Women will not register a second child for hukou if they will be sterilized for doing so. Women will not register second daughters for hukou if by doing so they are giving up the chance to have a son.

China’s Massive Population Control Apparatus Will Remain Intact.

Some have publicly wondered: What will happen to the army of Family Planning Officials, now that China has “abolished” the One Child Policy (11)? This question is overly optimistic. The Two-Child Policy remains just as coercive as the former One-Child Policy. This infrastructure of coercion can be turned to crush dissent of any kind. It will therefore be maintained under the Two-Child Policy.

There is growing unrest inside China. “[I]nternal Chinese law enforcement data on socalled “mass incidents” – a wide variety of protests ranging from sit-ins to strikes, marches and rallies, and even genuine riots – indicated that China has seen a sustained, rapid increase in those incidents from 8,700 in 1993 to nearly 60,000 in 2003, to more than 120,000 in 2008 (12). Meanwhile, there are as many as 1 million Family Planning Officials (13). This army of Family Planning Officials can be turned in any direction to crush dissent of any sort. Does the Chinese Communist Party regard this army as necessary to maintain control in a tinder-box situation?

The Chinese Communist Party Will Never Relinquish Coercive Population Control

As fully explained in my Congressional testimony of April 30, 2015, the Chinese Communist Party will never relinquish coercive population control because 1) it enables them to maintain its grip on power through terror – it is social control, masquerading as population control; 2) it is a lucrative profit center, bringing in as much as $314 billion in fines since its inception; 3) it provides and infrastructure of coercion that can be used to crush dissent of any sort; and 4) it ruptures relationships of trust, so that people cannot organize for change. I believe that the Chinese Communist Party is maintaining its grip on power by shedding the blood of the innocent women and babies of China.

Conclusion

Sending out the message that China has “abandoned” its one-child policy is detrimental to sincere efforts to stop forced abortion and gendercide in China, because this message implies that the one-child policy is no longer a problem. In a world laden with compassion fatigue, people are relieved to cross China’s one-child policy off of their list of things to worry about. But we must not do that. Let us not abandon the women of China, who continue to face forced abortion, and the baby girls of China, who continue to face sex-selective abortion and abandonment under the new Two-Child Policy.

The one-child policy does not need to be modified. It needs to be abolished.

Policy Recommendations:

We respectfully request that the U.S. government urge the Chinese government to:

*Abolish the Two-Child Policy and all forms of coercive population control;

*Offer incentives for couples to have girls (14);

*Offer pensions to couples who do not have a son, ensuring that parents of girls will not become impoverished in their old age; and

*Abolish the hukou system, so that all children will have access to healthcare and education.

In addition, we respectfully request that the U.S. government:

*Establish principles of Corporate Social Responsibility, to ensure that U.S. corporations do not allow coercive population control measures to be taken against their employees; and

*Defund UNFPA, unless and until UNFPA stops supporting or participating in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization in China, in violation of the 1985 Kemp-Kasten Amendment.

1 “Why Critics Are Not Satisfied with the End of China’s One-Child Policy.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/10/29/why-critics-are-not-satisfied-with-the-end-of-chinas-one-childpolicy/ 10/29/15; “Still No Dignity for Chinese Women.” http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/11/opinion/china-one-child-policy-stillno-dignity-for-chinese-women.html 11/11/15; “Change from One- to Two-Child Policy Won’t End Forced Abortions in China.” http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/penny-starr/human-rights-advocate-change-one-two-child-policy-wont-end-forced-abortions 10/29/15; “Horrors of One-Child Policy Leave Deep Scars in Chinese Society.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/horrors-of-one-child-policy-leave-deep-scars-in-chinesesociety/2015/10/30/6bd28e0c-7e7b-11e5-bfb6-65300a5ff562_story.html 10/30/15

2 “2-Child Policy ‘to fuel growth by 0.5%.’” http://www.chinadailyasia.com/nation/2015-11/10/content_15342620.html 11/1/15; “China Amps Up PR Campaign Extolling ‘Two-Child Policy.’” http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/10/china-amps-prcampaign-extolling-two-child-policy/ 11/10/15

3 “China Stresses Two-Child Policy Not Yet Valid.” http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-11/10/c_134802823.htm 11/10/15; No Help for Chinese Mom Expecting Second Child: New Two-Child Policy Won’t Be Enacted in Time to Save Pro-Life Leader Facing Pressure to Abort.” http://www.worldmag.com/2015/10/no_relief_for_chinese_mom_expecting_second_child 10/30/15

4 “China’s Population-Control Machine Churns On.” https://www.freedomhouse.org/blog/china-population-control-machine-churns 1/13/14

5 While shrinking, nearly half of China’s population remains rural, accounting for some 600 million people. World Bank: “Urban Population (% of total).” http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS

6 “No Help for Chinese Mom Expecting Second Child: New Two-Child Policy Won’t Be Enacted in Time to Save Pro-Life Leader Facing Pressure to Abort.” http://www.worldmag.com/2015/10/no_relief_for_chinese_mom_expecting_second_child 10/30/15

7 “Experts Worried Pre-Natal Blood Test Might Lead to Sex-Selective Abortions.” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/11980660/Experts-worried-pre-natal-blood-test-might-lead-to-sex-selective-abortions.html. 11/6/15; “New Method Allows Noninvasive prenatal testing to detect more diseases: Study.” http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2015-11/10/c_134799694.htm, 11/10/15

8 “Crazed Chinese father-of-four stabs two government officials to death over one child policy.” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2376771/Chinese-father-kills-1-child-policy-officials-registering-4th-child.html 7/24/13.

9 “Chinese father of four commits suicide over one-child policy fines so his children can go to school.” http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/chinese-father-of-four-commits-suicide-over-one-child-policy-fines-so-his-c. 5/26/14; “Farmer drinks poison after being fined for violations of family planning policy.” http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/830847.shtml 12/8/13

10 “Plan to Register 13 Million ‘Unofficial’ Chinese Sparks Doubts.” http://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/plan-to-register-13- million-unofficial-chinese-sparks-doubts-11252015100418.html 11/25/15

11 “After the One-Child Policy: What Happens to China’s Family-Planning Bureaucracy?” http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2015/11/12/after-the-one-child-policy-what-happens-to-chinas-family-planning-bureaucracy/ 11/12/15

12 “China’s Social Unrest Problem – Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.” Murray Scott Tanner, Ph.D. http://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Tanner_Written%20Testimony.pdf. 5/15/14; see also, “Rising Protests in China.” http://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2012/02/rising-protests-in-china/100247/. 2/17/12.

13 “Family Planning: Enforcing with a smile.” http://www.economist.com/news/china/21638131-enforcers-chinas-one-child-policyare-trying-new-gentler-approach-enforcing-smile. 1/10/15; “The bureaucracy that oversees family planning in China is enormous. According to official statistics of the National Health and Family Planning Commission (NHFPC), there are over 500,000 administrative staff and technical service providers from the central government down to the township level devoted to both policy enforcement and family planning generally. In addition, more than 1.2 million cadres assist in birth planning at the village level.” “After the One-Child Policy: What Happens to China’s Family-Planning Bureaucracy?” http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2015/11/12/after-the-one-child-policy-what-happens-to-chinas-family-planning-bureaucracy/ 11/12/15 If China’s Family Planning Officials were an army, they would tie with North Korea as the sixth largest army in the world. “World’s Largest Armies.” http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/armies.htm.

 

14 We have found in our “Save a Girl” campaign that the encouragement of modest monetary support is enough to make the difference between life and death to a baby girl. “Twin Girls Saved from Abortion in China, Husband’s Family Only Wanted Boys.” http://www.lifenews.com/2014/05/30/twin-girls-saved-from-abortion-in-china-husband-family-told-wife-they-only-wanted-boys/ 5/30/14

Posted in abortion, Chen Guangcheng, China's One Child Policy, coerced abortion, Forced Abortion, forced sterilization, gendercide, hukou, Marco Rubio, One Child Policy, pro-choice, pro-life, Reggie Littlejohn, reproductive health, reproductive rights, right to choose, Save a Girl, sex selective abortion, two child policy, Uncategorized, Women's Rights Without Frontiers | Comments Off on China’s Two-Child Policy, New Number – Same Violence Against Women

Giving Tuesday – Please help us save women and babies in China!

We’ve Received $5000 in Matching Funds!

We need $50,000 to continue our work!

Dear Friends:

In this season of giving, please remember the women and babies of China, who are still enduring conditions that are beyond imagination.  At this moment, there are women in China who have gotten pregnant without a “birth permit” and are in danger of being dragged away for a forced abortion, up to the ninth month of pregnancy.  Baby girls in China are in danger of selective abortion and abandonment.

You may have heard that China has “abandoned” its One Child Policy.  This is not true.

Regarding the new Two-Child Policy, blind activist Chen Guangcheng tweeted,  “This is nothing to be happy about. First the (Chinese government) would kill any baby after one. Now they will kill any baby after two.”

The brutality continues.  This October Women’s Rights Without Frontiers was featured at a powerful event in the United States Library of Congress to expose the truth of China’s One Child Policy.  The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation invited Representative Chris Smith, blind activist Chen Guangcheng, and Women’s Rights Without Frontiers President Reggie Littlejohn to join forces to expose the atrocities of forced abortion and gendercide in China.   We talked about women like Feng Jianmei, who was forcibly aborted at 7 months.  China reports that it has 13 million abortions a year.  That’s 35,000 a day, or almost 1500 an hour.  The brutality of China’s forced abortion policy is repeated thousands of times every day.

Meanwhile, China leads the world in the sex-selective abortion of baby girls.  Our Save a Girl campaign is saving the lives of baby girls at risk of being aborted or abandoned because of son preference in China!  Through our network of on-the-ground fieldworkers, we are able to reach women who are pregnant with or who have just given birth to a girl, and are being pressured to abort or abandon her.  We offer these mothers encouragement and a monthly stipend for a year, empowering them to keep their daughters.

This girl is one of 200 babies saved by our “Save a Girl” Campaign.

This girl is one of 200 babies saved by our “Save a Girl” Campaign.

We have an overwhelming success rate and have saved 200 precious babies through this campaign.

Reggie Littlejohn and Anni Zhang in Yosemite, August 2015

Reggie Littlejohn and Anni Zhang in Yosemite, August 2015

We also rescued Zhang Anni, the persecuted daughter of dissident Zhang Lin.  She was called “the youngest prisoner of conscience in China,” as she was kidnapped out of her elementary school at age 10 and detained overnight.  The Chinese government persecuted Anni in an attempt to silence her heroic father.  We raised the visibility of Anni’s case internationally and then conducted quiet diplomacy to get her out of China.  She is now living with my husband and me and we are raising her as our own daughter. 

At the U.S. Library of Congress on Capitol Hill in D.C., Reggie addresses attendees of the November 2015 China Forum, sponsored by the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation.

At the U.S. Library of Congress on Capitol Hill in D.C., Reggie addresses attendees of the November 2015 China Forum, sponsored by the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation.

Women’s Rights Without Frontiers has been called the “leading voice” in the battle against forced abortion and gendercide in China.  Indeed, I was astonished and humbled to be named one of the “Top Ten People” of 2013 by Inside the Vatican magazine. We have testified seven times at the U.S. Congress, three times at the European Parliament, twice at the British Parliament, and have briefed the Canadian Parliament, the State Department, the White House, the United Nations and the Vatican.  Our efforts have born fruit.  Both the European Parliament and the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women have issued statements condemning forced abortion.  We are unique in having the attention of both the left and the right.

Women’s Rights Without Frontiers needs your support to continue.  We need to raise $50,000.00 to continue our work.  Please prayerfully consider partnering with us in fighting perhaps the greatest injustice of our age.

The women and babies of China urgently need your help!  If you would like to partner with us, please send a check made out to Women’s Rights Without Frontiers to:

Reggie Littlejohn met Pope Francis in October 2013.  She was named one of the “Top 10” People of 2013 by Inside the Vatican magazine.

Reggie Littlejohn met Pope Francis in October 2013. She was named one of the “Top 10” People of 2013 by Inside the Vatican magazine.

Women’s Rights Without Frontiers

1919 Gunston Way

San Jose, CA 95124

WRWF is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, California Non-Profit Corporation # 3296236; EIN # 90-0591575EIN.  Donations are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by U.S. law.

With gratitude,

Reggie Littlejohn, President

Women’s Rights Without Frontiers

Posted in Chen Guangcheng, China, China's One Child Policy, Chinese Communist Party, coerced abortion, communism, Forced Abortion, forced sterilization, One Child Policy, pro-choice, pro-life, Reggie Littlejohn, reproductive health, reproductive rights, Save a Girl, sex selective abortion, two child policy, Uncategorized, Women's Rights Without Frontiers | Comments Off on Giving Tuesday – Please help us save women and babies in China!

Give Thanks by Saving a Girl in China

Picture1Women’s Rights Without Frontiers wishes your family a very Happy Thanksgiving!  As you gather with your family to give thanks, is there a woman or girl in your life you’d like to thank – for just being her? If so, here is a creative way to let her know you care!

For the month of November, you can help “Save a Girl” by “thanking a girl” – more info below!

Isn’t this baby girl just precious?

She has the face of a sleeping angel.  A mother couldn’t help but want to show off a beautiful daughter like this to her neighborhood, let alone the whole world.

Unless the mother had to hide her, because her baby girl was “illegal.”

Meet Ai Mei. Loved as she is by her parents, she is despised by her government.

Why? Because her parents lacked the birth permit required by Chinese law in order to conceive and give birth to a child. As a result, Ai Mei is considered an “illegal baby” – her very existence breaks the law! — though born in China to Chinese parents. Had her mother’s pregnancy been discovered prior to delivery, she would have been subjected to a forced abortion unless she could pay the fine. Hardly a “fine” by the American standards of a parking ticket, this crushing bill can total up to ten times a person’s annual salary. Since many families like Ai Mei’s are already poor, they cannot afford to pay the hefty toll, so they pay a different one – a life of hiding in fear of the Family Planning Police. Already, Ai Mei’s parents live in a house that had been abandoned for more than eight years.  It has no electricity or gas.  They keep the gate closed, so one knows that anyone lives there. Often, this constant stress and financial strain can lead a family to do the unthinkable – to give away or to abandon their baby girl.

Thankfully, a trusted Women’s Rights Without Frontiers fieldworker learned about the family’s plight and told them about our “Save a Girl” program.  She told them we provide a monthly stipend to families to empower them to keep their girl. In the midst of their woe, the parents were grateful to know that someone else valued their daughter and the risks they were taking to raise her.

Don’t believe China’s lies; the new two-child policy is still coercive population control

Don’t think for a moment that China’s two-child policy will change anything. If China was truly concerned about its demographic situation, why have any birth limit? Coercive population control is alive and strong as ever and birth permits are required just as they were before. Sadly, there will be countless more families like Ai Mei’s facing pressures to abort or to abandon – but there could be fewer if we had your help.

This Thanksgiving, will you help “Save a Girl” by giving thanks for yours?

Maybe you can’t wrap your girl in a pink blanket anymore, but you can wrap her in words of gratitude!

Step 1: Donate $25 or more – the amount of money it takes to help support a girl saved in China for one month

Step 2: Indicate in the notes section of your donation the woman or girl you wish to honor, and her email address. We will send her a message to let her know you have given her a donation in her honor to our “Save a Girl” Campaign.

Will you help us save women and girls in China? Become a “GirlSaver!”

Won’t you help us save more girls like Ai Mei? So far, we have saved 200 girls, and yet there are millions more who are being aborted or abandoned just because they are girls. Each one of these girls is infinitely precious. Please help us save them by donating to our “Save a Girl” Campaign.

Learn more about how you can help to save girls here:
http://womensrightswithoutfrontiers.org/index.php?nav=give

For $25 per month, or $300 per year, our GirlSavers have helped WRWF save at-risk babies in China, babies like Ai Mei, who may not be alive if one of our undercover fieldworkers had not met her mother and assured her that little girls are as special as boys. We put our money where our mouth is, offering practical assistance to empower these mothers to keep their daughters.

YES, I WANT TO HELP END GENDERCIDE AND FORCED ABORTION IN CHINA!

Your donation enables Women’s Rights Without Frontiers to continue to be a voice for the voiceless women and children of China. This huge effort comes at a cost. We need your support. Please give as generously as you can. Every donation makes a difference!

 

Posted in Forced Abortion, gendercide, One Child Policy, Save a Girl | Comments Off on Give Thanks by Saving a Girl in China

China: Man executed for killing two family planning officials

A man who stabbed two Family Planning Officials to death and wounded four others in 2013 has been executed, according to a report appearing in the South China Morning Post.  The man, He Shenguo of Guangxi Province, was unable to pay the fine for his “illegal” fourth child, so Family Planning Officials denied registration to the child. These fines can be up to ten times a person’s annual salary and out of reach for many in China.

Reggie Littlejohn, President of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, stated:  “This tragic situation shows that China’s One (now Two) – Child Policy devastates not only women, but also men and children.  Under this policy, if a child is “illegal” — born without a birth permit — that child will be denied hukou, or household registration.  Children without hukou will have no birth certificate, no official existence.  They will not be eligible for health care or education.  They cannot get a passport or driver’s license.  They will not be able officially to marry or work. As far as the Chinese government is concerned, these children do not exist.

Unfortunately, the Chinese Government will continue the hukou system under the new Two-Child Policy.  This denial of hukou is extremely distressing to parents, who may feel that their beloved children have no future.  In another tragic incident last year, a Chinese father of four committed suicide because his children were denied hukou.

Denial of hukou is a form of official child abuse.  It must end.

Related Links:

South China Morning Post: China man executed for killing two family planning officials who refused to register birth of fourth childhttp://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/1878448/china-man-executed-killing-two-family-planners-who-refused11/13/15

Crazed Chinese father-of-four stabs two government officials to death over one child policy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2376771/Chinese-father-kills-1-child-policy-officials-registering-4th-child.html 7/24/13.

Chinese father of four commits suicide over one-child policy fines so his children can go to school. http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/chinese-father-of-four-commits-suicide-over-one-child-policy-fines-so-his-c. 5/26/14; “Farmer drinks poison after being fined for violations of family planning policy.” http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/830847.shtml 12/8/13

Posted in hukou, One Child Policy, two child policy | Comments Off on China: Man executed for killing two family planning officials

EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo Interviews Reggie re: China’s Two-Child Policy

Dear Friend,

We are grateful to Raymond Arroyo for interviewing WRWF’s Reggie Littlejohn on why forced abortion and gendercide will continue under China’s new Two-Child Policy.  Please help us get the truth out — watch and share!

Raymond Arroyo and Reggie Littlejohn on the set for EWTN's The World Over.

Raymond Arroyo and Reggie Littlejohn on the set for EWTN’s The World Over.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Watch the video here.

Posted in EWTN, Raymond Arroyo, Reggie Littlejohn, two child policy, Uncategorized | Comments Off on EWTN’s Raymond Arroyo Interviews Reggie re: China’s Two-Child Policy

Chinese: 40 Million Bachelors Can Just Share Wives

China Daily has cheerfully announced the economic gains expected through the implementation of its new two-child policy:  an increased labor force and GDP, as well as a reduction in the percentage share of elderly people.  Official publications, however, have not asserted that the new two-child policy will balance the other great demographic disaster caused by the former one-child policy:  the gender disparity between male and female.

The new two-child policy will do little or nothing to improve the intractable gender imbalance caused by the one child policy.  First, what about the tens of millions of men who currently cannot find wives?   Girls born now will not be marriage age for decades.  Second, raising children in China is expensive, and many couples are caring for both sets of elderly parents as well.  Those whose first child is a son may choose not to have a second child.  Those whose first child is a daughter may choose to have a second child, but many will abort if that second child is also a daughter.  Second daughters are extremely vulnerable to gendercide in China.  This will not change under the two-child policy.

Shortly before China announced its move to a two-child policy, Chinese economist Professor Xie Zuoshi of Shejiang University, offered a controversial solution to China’s gender imbalance.  Xie estimated that by the year 2020, there will be 40 million more males than females.  These males, whom he terms “guanggun” or “bare branches,” will never be able to find wives or have children.  Xie sees this as an economic problem with an economic solution:  Allow men to share wives.

Professor Xie’s proposal ignited such a firestorm of criticism on the Chinese Internet that he has removed his original blog post, complaining that he has been “endlessly abused” for what he sees as an obvious solution to an intractable problem.  His original post has nevertheless been widely quoted in the media.

Xie wrote:

With so many guanggun, women are in short supply and their value increases.  But that doesn’t mean the market can’t be adjusted.  The guanggun problem is actually a problem of income.  High-income men can find a woman because they can pay a higher price.  What about low-income men?  One solution is to have several take a wife together.

Professor Xie’s proposal is an outrage and underscores the fact that the largest social experiment in the history of the world – the One Child Policy – has resulted in an unmitigated demographic and social disaster.  Xie’s proposal ignores the fact that the reason there are 30 to 40 million more males living in China than females is that the females were selectively aborted – the ultimate form of discrimination against women.  Now, Xie offers a ham-handed supply and demand analysis, with women as the ‘goods.’  The women who survived this ongoing gendercide epidemic are expected to be wives to ‘several’ men.  The misogyny expressed in the selective abortion of baby girls would then lead to the commodification of women as wives of several men.  The impetus driving this proposal is concern for the needs of men, without any concern for the rights or feelings of women.

The bizarre nature of Xie’s proposal – about which Xie insists he is “not joking” — underscores the urgency of addressing China’s intractable gender imbalance — the greatest of any nation in the world, because of the unique pressure of the One Child Policy.  Gendercide will not subside in China under the new two-child policy.  The Chinese government must abandon all coercively enforced birth limits.   Further, Women’s Rights Without Frontiers calls upon the Chinese government to enforce its ban on sex-selective abortion.

Through our “Save a Girl” Campaign, a fieldworker will appear at the door of a woman who is pregnant or who has just given birth, and is being pressured to abort or abandon her daughter, just because she is a girl.  We extend encouragement and practical help, offering a monthly stipend for a year to empower women to keep their daughters.  We have saved almost 200 girls and are ending gendercide, one baby girl at a time.

Posted in gendercide, Reggie Littlejohn, two child policy, Uncategorized, Women's Rights Without Frontiers | Comments Off on Chinese: 40 Million Bachelors Can Just Share Wives

Sen. Ted Cruz Slams One Child Policy, Quotes WRWF’s Reggie Littlejohn

Listen to the short clip of Senator Ted Cruz quoting Women’s Rights Without Frontiers President Reggie Littlejohn from the Senate floor last week, slamming China on the horrors of its human rights-abusing coercive population control:

“This is an outrage. No legitimate government would commit or tolerate such an act.”

None of these human rights abuses will stop under the new two-child policy.

Click Here to listen to his passionate speech.

Learn more about Women’s Rights Without Frontiers and how you can help us help the women and China by clicking here. You can us also stay-up-to-date on these issues by liking us on Facebook and following us on Twitter.

Congressman Chris Smith and Sen. Marco Rubio have also issued statements cautioning that China’s move to a two child policy will not end brutal, coercive population control.

 

Posted in China's One Child Policy, Chinese Communist Party, coerced abortion, communism, crime against humanity, female suicide, Feng Jianmei, Forced Abortion, One Child Policy, pro-choice, pro-life, Reggie Littlejohn, reproductive health, reproductive rights, right to choose, Ted Cruz, Uncategorized, Women's Rights Without Frontiers | Comments Off on Sen. Ted Cruz Slams One Child Policy, Quotes WRWF’s Reggie Littlejohn